IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Lamenting clusters...

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Wed, 18 May 2022 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A70C1D34E7 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1652917693; bh=14/2gh/PLi/I6oBflLnDR2bxV7Mk61ZrybpgCKXFc7A=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=GojZxNb6fhlS2pko1IUSLDHS8Rsk19PqLHMde0Qbrdba5sQo+IEiyLOCeFWM++Z+T YVudlL+Xh586NbVnKFmSqZxBKmy+rowUsKcEJJ2N4AYRT/zPwiqRgJItRxNI89FJe/ fle8O+BIw4UzWRFOjREokc+DEc6rIVpihNwRvtoc=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed May 18 16:48:13 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A24C1B92A8; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1652917693; bh=14/2gh/PLi/I6oBflLnDR2bxV7Mk61ZrybpgCKXFc7A=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=GojZxNb6fhlS2pko1IUSLDHS8Rsk19PqLHMde0Qbrdba5sQo+IEiyLOCeFWM++Z+T YVudlL+Xh586NbVnKFmSqZxBKmy+rowUsKcEJJ2N4AYRT/zPwiqRgJItRxNI89FJe/ fle8O+BIw4UzWRFOjREokc+DEc6rIVpihNwRvtoc=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9264CC1B92AC for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.844
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.844 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mUgIzYx85t5E for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 321FCC1B92A7 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id u23so6291667lfc.1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ruHPivKid46kFvihE4U37Tgp6sAVDUfr7qIuMtz2ul8=; b=kIrOHMqKDuJ9xp/d32qoVlBIVeYTezQ1xIrBL+gWSfdFM0tmhXUROYmz52nwPBQ5UC 7ktSyq+kWbGlzR6PS8wh4S85npT0f0nADxEj9ugmVBoHYdp8iUzCbWokqv8GTspgWF2p qvIyc0YY3q0Ocr5ioUv+mMUxD5qymjhV9X99Xh+VbDyn5cHTNLO8QT6O83miu7qcXIKA AuSDgyOPmDk2MuRJJHby1GDMNnNTZxPh0Z41Kud0MF5bS3rh2w1ChPlOm+B4kHilIHXb c8oGBlF+wKTS5nS5o9KBlDuWD2O47pfc1XD1L5QctoLEFoMF5Zs4820ScoE261rFjNfQ f+Kw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ruHPivKid46kFvihE4U37Tgp6sAVDUfr7qIuMtz2ul8=; b=qFCAcJdPGVt51AyWyXL6rLv0giNzo+PigiE7Ni8nPmXVFhcNNO3ZWBotO6B5procp5 O93VRf3oiamYE/Z+ncaqUKSNZn1MbQxIGUm+kLjPsPKQZMqIzH/1cWs1RbsB0MVS34b2 sFCoqfqi43hND2wPf6kxo9js91qKl7yXyo6GGOgx8fLwKSBkj2k1b40s+HAHiPaPVDr9 ah2fhgtK+8KXeMs96HkIOY9NBBD+3PAUNU8lydjc2HYKdS7JI1Jm/dE1m1D8YnDMPM3Q uyzcOVvq4nAj0KZHnXLcY1xTCa2zpJd7sxel7+y+iaLpCNSSX7U2nb8rlxV4nQr6NSfi hUEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300xKHqOT7T0VMgOQ3lvYLQXbPVAdPiLQS8ymU5UcKNoRz9804R OhoUnAZmQNGjqNGczElMV+tzkCfs2+bYdJLfWdOBldQZ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4RcqBiF6BAq2jcQePmrbugcGNZAwcfMFTy5wlJkTRavh18wUr1ys+RWJ8ITtEWAJajjLEDq0mQlCmO0PhSMc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:114a:b0:473:d6a9:625a with SMTP id m10-20020a056512114a00b00473d6a9625amr1312413lfg.338.1652917685301; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <46621756-BEC7-4321-868D-0DA83F2B137A@tzi.org> <659830.1652907223@dooku>
In-Reply-To: <659830.1652907223@dooku>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 19:47:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEGrar2+s3y5PsOBRG02=8FfHV46QLAGEZ0BqOcvUhs-eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/3Yk7XGZtUte2l-dw3YFIY5a9o5E>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Lamenting clusters...
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6806238987066277632=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

I think Informative references are normally to drafts and do not cause a
hold up until the draft is published as an RFC.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com


On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 4:53 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>     > “Teaches me not even to have an informative reference to a spec that
>     > informatively references another spec that normatively references a
>     > not-yet-published spec.”
>
> Does doing this result in being in cluster with that spec?
>
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email