IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-Tiny

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 22 January 2020 05:50 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB2AF406F5 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:50:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A0_4T0gELI1M for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:50:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64FB5F406F4 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:50:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1579672254; bh=qL1J/sIgB3L3OiEVRmC0ODOo/bq81IDflpW4hJZiq04=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=DpG5QrOTU+IadOhSfX4263VikDbhmqv6lFE8DxFuKaqr4DakVAHZWK78sHrG6Dz3E EupBzBNlhRwmSK0eHdObIJpJpMnB2CkNZiYIba6s18lzN8hQmYft4/OUBYMzreDC6Z 2ex5/nyYYVcCOKaJqKvRA2M+x0tKC13xIC/AH1j0=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([91.61.62.73]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MHoRA-1io4tP3xQM-00EsgY; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 06:50:54 +0100
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <CAMm+Lwik7vYQA9wHDscU50yvoOoiPN3p1T38Z2Y_ftVbtj2CCw@mail.gmail.com> <4698.1579663857@localhost>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <058ab37b-b16c-5f4d-55ca-7d6e3a3c1cb7@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 06:50:51 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4698.1579663857@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:w4VTs1YqKHDwk0gFEnm0gX6bZ0PY7YlhEXYVXVBzlF9YVFdHLv5 XGG65z0TaB43b/f5HI7yVC2227VjUFOkOqyL/CUQwviM3h0ZH1ayIn4YbW6iKVgbwJdoQcO WXyP8HepZ60HrK33fmSH6l9N6YYCdW5WK9RqTkAtNbMIrUSgpv3rhPiygwo5feFRwW05jK4 efXjLSenrx0T0BgX56pOQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:j78+1ZtDmR0=:ExXk/e7Zbo9DLTkfQFxE5x xdJ0dCxeeauG3UgjJIL/O+wHTkXc8sgSvzVWcUBXENqSx1RsCSc5NQYcr1ygZOppWj/IhDqwX 4kHAM18jDLER76Nu+f5I3U6bI2+ac17EIObmbljnQGHqEk0geWJxO96kJFaXgw7fkfw8F1q0w OJXpGKJf0DzNlR5GrEcCS902mR9KBLlV3oV4u59n74TVItjdu/4kPk2AoGGI2XsJ4D8WHUX3g YqN2sCkzD+JUixSCgF4cxTJz94oFvcDA+et8UXmXijmCzGeFxWdHrF9bbNh21pSA/49FTtmg1 rJ1k0LJSjbjBLqK1K+x5ZxRg2xJnw9ptcTlw9C107oHrFFLISbScSNekrxR4YazmBnQ1ctug9 1E2I9KtHP+a42/85LWPTOatCBMkUrUTDtI9CLMOTg/UnlTBYY8dzPtvxI9q22wPL8QlThFJ4v 3sypS5phBW8uvN7SP8qFg1Ehpemwq2Xq8WVWYCJXj7BLziwGV0p7dKZacmqYAGwe6OOvvezll 74t5fEznjgcrCx6TXkJA8/AH9P3k2G8sySKeSsOUTYYu5qclPvo23qUgeSjlqtlNvnhWM7LWY 69Lh/b33+EmIsot1Wa4lgVjSYa9uKSy5WWl0PIEVotMORfEVaDru9Gni8kngXe87MXwsMZYNU TCZXXawXT4+I3T2UU0qJbEK/EUuWp1rTDuSwg1aFsEAjfFlFTNHzs6HKB8HXsPxvOTKWjbxJP +Dg0e9sEkYf0dcaZafJTjVGTGHx7mBwQFq74tVYfY+zJM1N5w99Fhcie7Ll9E0e5hRLhs8EF+ YiznDQilHxvziy1++qj3kJ19Uy+1FBtog+qHxF+w8AAooa7EyZtcWGrvRjGCUCBFZ2qqo1oaZ Cm4JKotFFvtWf2vcqdeeuL4ORIC1Vp7R+gWmu0ucqtSlNqhENSQHeCiNVIGGsJRFq+2PzRy/s lYpACmHCrGi+ZqBp4Vmo4w/+bSGjMUI+HL1aQb9s0JkweP3Z30zcdcWIMZjihxORWpaDHyFOV 2klTXNEOn3e8OWjE1b5hXRICMaIKBgEPn9ubjQO6TQKbmcDz0/z+TjKqj91t5WS3RWzXD5X5u /aKut+PcyJKGke3dDHxQ3AMGW3U3xBPCPtnJAFdYEsHY56ZWvJxMKlwrM8z3qrescvrUVSEFv gf+QDwn8DszegxB5IdWE4a9O7sCNOekC65y9aBDDsLLuuAgZL4sv2a4Cr6ZmRructei3lRqvX GVXxNRtZVjD4V3osASgENGB2jpEY3yewRiAf1jh4wSZub13Q6WM0vJ4uyYDI=
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-Tiny
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 05:50:52 -0000

On 22.01.2020 04:30, Michael Richardson wrote:
> ...
> I think that it is reasonable to re-open the conversation.
> I again, am concerned about changing too many things while we adapt to
> xml-v3, but I think we should figure stuff out in the I-D series.

Yes, we absolutely need to focus on the current mess. We don't have a
"V3" right now. We have something that has an implementation but no spec
and a myriad of unprocessed tickets (not to mention the email feedback).

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email