IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 03 May 2022 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52471C1595E6 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 07:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651587943; bh=aReNLGfqsiuioMPUv0HdoLxUfWYnBFIph43Trq6Hbws=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=xAE6bmX6mwfcsjBZ30y0gfEF9qDcdDtLjhBPkY0YuH51b78AGgewxPjNFLUNfW5ep l7vEoE+gaD6xs03QeUIZKkkeECjcqtvdUcodF7hCa24I698ecpW+Fh08PPXAEfmW9a RFb7L9axVc0NPYGqIGYLTqvN4f0Hd80KYqFlTdjw=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue May 3 07:25:43 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE03C15949D; Tue, 3 May 2022 07:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651587943; bh=aReNLGfqsiuioMPUv0HdoLxUfWYnBFIph43Trq6Hbws=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=xAE6bmX6mwfcsjBZ30y0gfEF9qDcdDtLjhBPkY0YuH51b78AGgewxPjNFLUNfW5ep l7vEoE+gaD6xs03QeUIZKkkeECjcqtvdUcodF7hCa24I698ecpW+Fh08PPXAEfmW9a RFb7L9axVc0NPYGqIGYLTqvN4f0Hd80KYqFlTdjw=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3542AC14F749 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 07:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.933
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.933 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sak_Z-PYp70C for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 07:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 624FDC1594AD for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 07:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.114] ([47.186.48.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 243ENndu094645 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 09:23:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1651587830; bh=+yaF241tznSBmwTXQ95MMWAC+rAkFlDVFYp2YXlWIt4=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=IA9aUoodIZUJWDFL8olZHg8fhVpXjFyaePgmW6O1PMKrgwaPkty2PNFSg20JrZfkE fFAnQ1zEYHZ5hEILkVbs/v0535qviUQllx4bIID+6Ng/B+krgmwpDMKgdYo0aOjGfh khLMxmaZufGU1pnp3K6oQ4GN0XefRbQzclc8AKvU=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.48.51] claimed to be [192.168.1.114]
Message-ID: <2f655efd-603b-ebef-bb01-3859571dbd79@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 09:23:44 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20220503021720.69EDC3F4BACA@ary.qy>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220503021720.69EDC3F4BACA@ary.qy>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/3m14FGoEotljpfhecbcBXL-7lLw>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 5/2/22 9:17 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
> When I do a search I see the nonexistent authors page and also a bunch
> of pages at https://sandbox-ng.ietf.org/.  This suggests that something got
> spidered very strangely during the datatracker upgrade.
>
This was broken configuration on the sandbox machine (for both sandbox 
and sandbox-ng) that is now repaired.

Fwiw, sandbox-ng has served its purpose and will be taken down soon (at 
the moment it is effectively an alias for sandbox).

RjS

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email