[rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.11 <boilerplate>"
julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke) Tue, 08 March 2016 06:45 UTC
From: julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke)
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 07:45:13 +0100
Subject: [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.11 <boilerplate>"
Message-ID: <56DE74F9.2010203@gmx.de>
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-iab-xml2rfc-03.html#rfc.section.2.11>: "Holds the boilerplate text for the document. This section is filled in by the prep tool." (and it's defined to occur at most one time) This is mainly a question to the RFC Editor: before RFC 7322 (new style guide), stream and RFC Editor notes have been placed in between "Status Of This Memo" and "Copyright", thus a single <boilerplate> element would have been a problem (example RFC 7111). Can we rely on Status and Copyright to be back-to-back in the future? (Back in the past, we also had auto-generated IPR related information in the back of the document, but I assume we won't go back there?) Best regards, Julian
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.11 <boilerplate>" Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.11 <boilerplate>" Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.11 <boilerplate>" Paul Kyzivat
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.11 <boilerplate>" Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.11 <boilerplate>" Joe Hildebrand jhildebr
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.11 <boilerplate>" Paul Kyzivat
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.11 <boilerplate>" Joe Hildebrand jhildebr
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.11 <boilerplate>" Paul Kyzivat