IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] SVG tools?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 20 May 2019 04:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431B0120132 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 May 2019 21:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gprHBEQHqT2O for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 May 2019 21:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AE3512012F for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 May 2019 21:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7D9B82348; Sun, 19 May 2019 21:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C458B82345 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 19 May 2019 21:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B8y6RDEK1mL2 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 19 May 2019 21:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CF69B82344 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 19 May 2019 21:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1558327108; bh=aLD/rDEUrZLeyClnQulnuEjwxyP8rq5gQzLUIDxP45M=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=IT36tq5RIVvBsZndZMXSpPSQ2TmtdY9+vjzBWQQJ9t+paC6IMYwDb7gdHi16Qdv4U POyVmlQIll5ZwkA3KU0dO6hw2Q5zVyUhuOplFnqlqVKQFj+Ndq3Y/XuQ5H0mGwPjC1 TOGoJgpksntPqAj2Kgf0e6dagXC8NqzGS1tnt2vU=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.154.234]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LbMF8-1gmKJ42DZC-00l1Hj; Mon, 20 May 2019 06:38:28 +0200
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <c1a5086e-f28a-b855-0d3e-d9f53f2f2e5f@gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <f82d0aa9-52df-150c-a862-9e3ef0419c76@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 06:38:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c1a5086e-f28a-b855-0d3e-d9f53f2f2e5f@gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:gZFDJiWb4n8e8yhN0ql8m031WTb/5xs5r9hd8shnbzvyKiMK2Tb RvtLPVB6zyxnKDNGgWByscTU5cVPr3xdTWSipxAkibstYIaxf6l1DDGcmdKINK1CgvWEbkv wbZACXPm2CQpOYPjknE8AnykeZenCPT0kLKfd8ayJT9mDAjfK7Io6hK4Fd4aOJkTFU5YbNX /6UxI77KqnFA5nxv8+RIg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:/AvnbYANjWY=:gYU7BVRuckBFM+Wif/+Loj LmkpZ6524/DfTIqajBK+spCmb9C+8YhPPiaYpSqMEP6FCpne3j/q2qgGKFBTJBMVylfcOICxI WifX9gqx0pFSm4zESc7msLJWv2EUlQQMNSw2UPIAQ6CtWNhHwJFJTMc1bfvyatlTHmsUZPgfY 1rxG45RKK6x913B1BzAxuMYaW+Z4oq5HquIItPVv9m7dQrhw9SuZPpUoWgAtZVhX886Xa+uA+ HNlQMKTwhsXaZcGCu3j4SnRc8mMtXRwl1mg41lqsER4GdouayCsGEbDEBlIiTLQCRoVJYwyGQ /o1EG4NXro+j5Uz+K5LKmCwcRM+vK3PhDvSJFWEqWuEjEAQIjCDKvWaERDwKrAS5jEpKtqaHz sHlJQLle+dRFE2qZsaK8BD6qgif965HzkZV7zNisoDQK9P5hFC8lfqjXDTxVgzgnVrBbsknx3 bJ2SD2OT6svM0gnFzgiM8BoJaHgCuhEyxO/yHu6A+lRzdkGOGWVKSTXCr1qTtjNPTy8e+PA/4 MCYV0ueDYIAv0Yc/JFCGTgUXFqXlN7mZzXtBGJiymbp/xTHqulysg12N4pVn/xe2A5za8uG0E KbR1OWlYZlJPVx4eA7OjOF2tvN0Hiz7yU9g5C+sZnWGc01Hlr17RTRvsiLR8HQX86eM8fiPjV X+rSNjYESmKbjJpefh2zmqr9ZzzZ2xu+WJHrGJuFkaXRkIvLyX+bSSWzK99vbWZ/c0MTpdn2x c3lsq+ivo0cgbpUz+VFFELGUTgOPWaioGCz7cH3BhCxgsi7ePTx5oietdG+sjRSBuLmFVgTtk c74MPKntPo4F2zy+1sPNb3MgRZ2hlCx6EXU2WPJBExmoh/V1PMi7q3BwJe3nelHAa64HHWESf RDDAYBpRJ1yWDEgq3nLcPTfnMi9iMcO1mO/k/RO+G9HDMG3FV2cr2nuHMgHrHyfPGQol/jJwd Nl5R+ratGslHznnlmOZ/YrykIHe7TOVNrJmf0dX7lXzpuJQuUD2Nx
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] SVG tools?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 20.05.2019 06:07, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Who has experience to share about success with tools to generate SVG drawings for v3 format?
>
> At the moment I can only report failures: SVG files produced by LibreOffice and by https://onlineconvertfree.com/convert-format/png-to-svg/ both defeat the checking tool at https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/experimental.html#svg12checker
>
> (This is a change: an SVG 1.1 file that I generated with LibreOffice in 2014, when Nevil was developing the checker, still checks OK today, with a minor warning. When I regenerate it today with LibreOffice, it purports to be SVG 1.2 but the checker crashes with "RuntimeError: dictionary changed size during iteration".)
>
> Regards
>     Brian Carpenter

I did some tests a new months ago, and also included some
down-conversion in my version of the preptool
(<https://github.com/reschke/xml2rfc/blob/master/prep-xml2rfc.xslt>).
For me the main issue that was hard to fix was the lack of markers.

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email