[rfc-i] RFC2119 requirements language in security considerations?

[paul.hoffman at vpnc.org (Paul Hoffman)]

On 7 Apr 2016, at 17:01, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

>> This has been discussed occasionally in security WGs, with people 
>> noting that readers
>> often only skim the Security Considerations section and thus might 
>> miss the requirements.
>
> Seriously? After all these years you find that implementers don't read 
> them, even when the
> RFC2119 keywords are upper-cased?

Yes. They even admit it freely.

--Paul Hoffman