[rfc-i] [rfc-design] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "1.3.4 Additional Changes from v2"
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org (Paul Hoffman) Tue, 21 June 2016 23:56 UTC
From: paul.hoffman at vpnc.org (Paul Hoffman)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 16:56:14 -0700
Subject: [rfc-i] [rfc-design] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03,
"1.3.4 Additional Changes from v2"
In-Reply-To: <79f4273c-4e41-26cb-6090-c616b37c071f@gmx.de>
References: <79f4273c-4e41-26cb-6090-c616b37c071f@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <CE22E676-8D36-48AF-A262-ED0DDAE6BCC7@vpnc.org>
On 17 Jun 2016, at 7:25, Julian Reschke wrote: > <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-iab-xml2rfc-03.html#rfc.section.1.3.4>: > > "Made <seriesInfo> a child of <front>, and deprecated it as a child of > <reference>. This also deprecates some of the attributes from <rfc> > and moves them into <seriesInfo>." > > I recently worked on my implementation of that change, and found it to > cause lots of friction because code that supports v2 and v3 now needs > to support it in two places. > > It'll also cause problems with the reference libraries; do we expect > them to switch to v3 format (breaking older existing documents)? That's an open question. Maybe they'll support both versions. > AFAIU, this cause was motivated by the desire to use <seriesInfo> also > outside <reference>, thus for the current document. If that's the > goal, ouldn't it be much simpler to keep <seriesInfo> as child element > of reference>, and just allow it as child element of <rfc>? We discussed this earlier, and we didn't agree that it would be "much simpler". --Paul
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "1.3.4 Additional C… Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] [rfc-design] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "1.3.4… Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] [rfc-design] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "1.3.4… Julian Reschke