IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] what metric replaces page-count?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 13 April 2021 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD123A0CD5; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vbNKIHwlrjMZ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 456DF3A0CD4; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3E5F407A4; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9531EF407A4 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WD0tASWaRscw for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E723F40795 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1618296749; bh=oKa3CqOBkCzylCesaWVPvOyHIjrtYjyOVBL7amZ9Pzg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=igjHWqwuR05ZUnSUU38ZIkMTaHyfgZ8cyRKYUG6eXAXixq4XuQRaQ17webR65E6WZ 6F1uLXsytSyuy+86BX4iL4zRzxQLswEP6XRvBv7Q0nf+PeTjGDjAj6LamE7xoIdFJp HpIXVIeH0qMTNJInD5moLEHPyxBlNT4wUUg33lzA=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([91.61.50.232]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MQ5rU-1lAGDM3om0-00M7IQ for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:52:28 +0200
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <14f3d28f-c96-2530-6a41-a182bc633f9b@taugh.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <26036415-187f-037a-60df-ba8b4312e3fc@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:52:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <14f3d28f-c96-2530-6a41-a182bc633f9b@taugh.com>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:yc/5ejAjyQ70GszXgFZzY5z1UUkeOXBnFIpZXJhfZl63JiLhagU 9IlG2IWq9ukJt248sp3cyCZucb4gwODEaD6ygGCk71wpOvZ9uy0+1jsRa6i4ZoKHC7PSQtS QTe6S82lYKZB2ZjNjT3iEj9rIWyk+Ms2Y0b5FIJitQ4BSsNw/P3B3eSnR/pBMu73Qwc7+o0 HyI+WLmcgJJbKcQYrfxPg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:HnNP1zmYqZ8=:2gN4BwQXr7zMkf+yZk1a34 aZJjtHLGLcr+4lI3htqW081KUqs1keivQAD6h7GH9LmQVYk07PT5SWinjKIkGmVJr+gCC7Z3g wE/GVnUjjvswy8wspofdVFDWAQBOvhqZbZ/g3t8LQO+4Ag2Wp17izXlzi+Zai88/KRpsJQSKc O8rWaEZyhJAvETJAuvgB0vOHIIOYSFADYUWovNgHmt9MICOY62zqVNwMUfiy9VqSaSvQiYdhQ 5NYFUqBNB36r38KXTycfgNwvGVXY0Bn9UKgnQciDKbVL+CM8hv3lTHnrHn+g9hU71o9AzShPb 15TV3+cPgj2mplvlKoAVXvd7LghMOHsHR3OMYpPNuXMoRfm52KDykR4CzKMlTOO5DZ/mff0V1 D/y2l/394sbLRBIXWcPDk82PhMGWILSYWtknOSv2LcHYBJQ96YPw11QKwLc9TdRRyBdiUit2p jnPEK0FOJBtBNvjiG2c3619n9oE+9yHYf6My9cYR1MIrJKjMb2sgWnJ2ikNO+bjXt2Kv83+dS /QWRlBN2IkA9iybirZAP4boaRf6W8mNprm0t5ZQRZPGKBmq4Z2RG0DS6fZUvE0HTh4mpCzvXr FMo1xnxjn52nsingOIl22GKF9YmNEUwZSmO7/VXLL3h0sQBM0iWTY3RDHezICG50EEv2eV+O0 ow+XTj/pACCRhtgBIr4AG+yh0EwDVUa/g0DzXQzXBtQWZ+4lusQuIHUUYlTjLq/kgykDi7X/5 u9xqCtP+50BConpOg18a0uXFtLqojLuU2NF2eZGlSSpBPcNLKIWWsZKHUc5qQX6wdv4XDsWjn yYj3HZ4ov2wRH/W22CrapislwXe90hrd8F3qdJETw95U9DbVxDoZByZW2i4o3Z/ANhNEczyFR m6JmhYakhf4A+ZaLGPx1zhSJoPQPLOKLPb+q5hmZjrHi3QPm9ngg9CM9CWjspA1qwZHM1OaDm /e587gQq6e+jcrucrOG3YGRK1yt9URodh4StGEhZ0edfkMMM7bgstPqnDVnXfuiPMtkeI6N50 VqI8DLIuyXgElM3QsTymAzTQNKbdAfndFTc8PCQj+RyV25xZioLNusZZ04ZeMgugVl23BbDVm dKJWNpBPlk5AFoCdraETpTo4+w02wF39an9WrPW1+jcVAtly4CxI+duiQsIHkdkPTwphjykyt bQDB+WUafa+rdoVx2k6+V59H5fQRrdrrcKurM18GZ14m7CNXFUn6Q4j+TvWAaPDSeDGDGe9pP cVsUXdfPHTUTVCb7y
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] what metric replaces page-count?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 13.04.2021 um 03:54 schrieb John R Levine:
> It appears that Michael Richardson  <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> said:
>> John Levine's "but IDs still have page count" helps me not at all when
>> comparing two RFCs.  It this a document I can read over a coffee
>> break, or do
>> I need to lock-myself in the wifi-free tree-house all afternoon?
>
> The file size should give you a pretty good hint.
>
> I suppose we could publish mechanically generated word counts for some
> definition of "word".

Yep. The only question is how to treat the contents of <artwork> and
<sourcecode>.

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email