IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 03 May 2022 09:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E48DC15EB2D for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 02:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651571753; bh=zYvPVgJfl9Aw4PMMFP5oZuSIgpSzAnxI8mwR6MjcnZg=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=fkKVw82WenpDIZebM54l79MJMuIKlhmtk9jLTVq2ZsCz7MGg+77Vmzl8oPbABmhc+ QY3Lp6oRCiIefWvRfVq7PlhggvTPAPqpnDGzbKgoaEBHmD6yw7dNvVnGld1gBB8mRI YYtZ7Ho7ydMb/bUAoE2P/EI+Jm6lP+BZ4rseH7lo=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue May 3 02:55:53 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7FFC159485; Tue, 3 May 2022 02:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1651571753; bh=zYvPVgJfl9Aw4PMMFP5oZuSIgpSzAnxI8mwR6MjcnZg=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=fkKVw82WenpDIZebM54l79MJMuIKlhmtk9jLTVq2ZsCz7MGg+77Vmzl8oPbABmhc+ QY3Lp6oRCiIefWvRfVq7PlhggvTPAPqpnDGzbKgoaEBHmD6yw7dNvVnGld1gBB8mRI YYtZ7Ho7ydMb/bUAoE2P/EI+Jm6lP+BZ4rseH7lo=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983AEC159485 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 02:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.756
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.756 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JZnLnU-aOGTm for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 02:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38549C157B50 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 02:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1651571732; bh=JPMOKYeZPgE5b/F5g7aBF4yKj89qsv24cU9wbDjrUXM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=j221GANbVQz7dm+KqhwmwEClBXROURr3IzzsCWKZHqTcN8jynS3fCLXlSMwLzna9R BlPhhq65wvWwYRle472ewEhGHjydZBLBDY7liNia3wC4iXtksSDDYQ+TarJJpZunrK vB696IoRI01a/ypy3RK5JpmJIjIcBqABtPg3DQ4g=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.179] ([84.171.153.39]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MgvvT-1oK24k41uf-00hQup; Tue, 03 May 2022 11:55:32 +0200
Message-ID: <7d8da7fb-4850-ba06-b004-2449d4f2ef7c@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 11:55:30 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
To: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <YnCECATOh9mI1HY4@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20220503021720.69EDC3F4BACA@ary.qy> <YnCkoCzNTr3aquH/@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <5528eb31-2cbd-460b-720c-a69ebe4e7482@gmx.de> <C68D2369-4592-4F3A-8C37-FBB1A88D2E9D@tzi.org> <4c07cb3f-1bba-602d-7d8e-5e798e02d863@huitema.net> <35A90B8B-3ECD-495D-AAC2-51670E4FAF29@tzi.org> <4f682c77-a110-764b-dbf6-4d51695182f9@lear.ch>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4f682c77-a110-764b-dbf6-4d51695182f9@lear.ch>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:sI7v9Of3WAOOyaKYZ/GS83aMm8uUUpDkgu9RAPNk2PzjOpePBBE 8P2/LjRsdHYNqMjrhShBzv+XZmEgdQKuK5P5Z3PiRa4M+BiG/hYB31kzkV92lDFDiwybXcH JLpDwL93Iu4WIMLDxJ0q53DX/oqv+7iZKM++VJLg0r0lOetUM9ejynrZ81+n5Jkr5w1pKPM jr/2mA2w7+dsfEURsmNcQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:V9XdSQG0XKE=:/5z/NXacBdkzHVRR4qw37N HxP0M368BLiaE0CiJDLQ9vW3/wVzSJBZBQLyVy/hevNddp9jKe5i/L71DUPoom/iIhqi1xUy9 eyRktt09sCt7mRweA2tgIh0wkE58tx4iPjYc3OjjIXlG3f9PMQiqQ5FxOzZj5Z/EsEWmideMY RLyc9zpDAXBLwfJUMIXIjW9Mlulde34VrhfoEs8MBL+IK4JPWYz2cT9j1sv46bIsYF2d2b5op uDYwA1q5032bN1OOSTsFaJ8kd4Oyzvz0RSFLr5dQXEyQ33GmOBaE55O++oABpX5gXkPbcBD4Y Dd5EydrpOedtSBI7MElVC9X26lYmLXXRUhE/wkE3nAHuBuzjJdnR44nAWzXaNhngQNomNSxuG 4oJljJN95duB8x5A3tlgkZqAJ6GZ7FN72DSfm0Y7WLljuAgy/yjLCkddXKVES2P+QXFIlsWXM Qkdr7jxqQJ94RS4zZJW9ppcU8M1NR7CaWQ7McNocswgdM/UUO0rcBXnBx7jGDFqbjvsn8qzWt 2svr+jfFnux5A1aU2olgpS8aXdbvfzGue3pn4rubidELz/Q90stHAQEOgGpNeSEMBT/yo1CCV ddih4YWTqdQoyat9/4K1/j3nYVBUjzHsx5kcqGGqnudV2saQ4I2YFl32s4Wnm7CHJY4UgaYFy m50tqllC7jVY1nQfJkdAMMD/I6tWJSgAik1i/Bl+0LhZR8tlQXPujJpUcropZBNINvd6Q4JKy dvc4k4+j41Ci+0Xb1DXsY9HHOiFTHRSEmCaU6kV4KKS7ZQN7nYPzReH6BImigk0AttnRLn337 u/xLn6pOenLhA3DMoFxly3Kd+SF86dATi/0dErdXP+VMqjdiP08GIYXByI+qCUl52eXqYbTu8 HuHx1knc/dujTVNPDrUBAtLnMJCIAjyOqag3gQpbpVKQi7axzB4rkelObGL99iMZGP75y89TB A9oV8/1S4C+4txgTN2xyQblNX271D6oOKnVVkqoHCSpNYc26HAjkbuTChY9LanpBrhGcYulem gp7rE8ujUn10l5S2iZECJ5L9Xyo6DfEUq0SR4VmOvqRhks9oSepq0XdM5y2gDjnGV+Vz8ISZe MO+91Ov8pAui7Q=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/5HP1lZ6PFB7x4jXNPEFj72Lj3Xc>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Wrong Internet search results for new RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 03.05.2022 um 11:49 schrieb Eliot Lear:
> Unless someone made a recent change robots.txt, someone is harvesting
> the exclusions.  So we need to do something and fast. Changing the
> filename seems like it might cause some challenges for tooling in the
> short term, at least, and will definitely cause confusion for people
> like me who have to look at lots of RFC diffs.
>
> Is there a reason to provide a listing of documents at /authors?

It helps me tracking what is in AUTH48, and what changes are being made
(and when). (*)

Of course that wouldn't be needed if these files lived in a public
source code repository.

Best regards, Julian

(*) And yes, that *is* important. Sometimes there seems to be confusion
about what kind of changes are acceptable *after* the authors approved
publication.

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email