IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Tao [3rd party SDO cross-referencing of IETF work (was: Re: Chair/datatracker tracking expired WG documents ?)]

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 30 March 2022 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCAA3A0CF9 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1648652018; bh=eBz6oia4BXZFdkVl+lfYYweYluo0BWzLnlyoGJEpqpY=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc; b=LFPZlPesa9fMIdTeEcqER8k8dSM4VmARQU9mAdxDlK0xfqFi3NenqkjQyIQlGBm35 2zf23CZNrjabBeRMdCvZ1iH2zqYnLEDOPsWz87fQaG2f//S57TxA6vqRkpnbR6Qkae EYK64NSsrnE6OroRP4A8RRbLkv8mbwVaMKtwU/as=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 30 07:53:36 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341A43A0C5B; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1648652016; bh=eBz6oia4BXZFdkVl+lfYYweYluo0BWzLnlyoGJEpqpY=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc; b=XUoxEXq/u9GJx/PSfA2BIC+VNuiX2epmrBt77xMc3C7KU8RvwTomQcW/ITcQdMZ9s nKRwP932i8zlbVmaztVScuDudUZsOEGjiCOAXeUrgfZ4mKgcCejbqmoPy+TyTQOxsj UZmYa4RVSVZBADfDQ5Dp0AYJ+jJQlQmhrmSe9Vk4=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D63D3A0C4B for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3bXJK3dexllk for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAD423A0C64 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id c15so28005824ljr.9 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8HNFE+FMkLt1sLvKZD0UHj4evL/3tNsZTlKx/wDfBNA=; b=ASYZMi31OnCOCsV4obqLQP+SW9FhKOvhAy8WNraO4ESfK3lULI0/zQapYpepzH7wSm xx6NO9VH3/iygS2iqgAjpYzHNa5wQlZDNf6Z8A8epbH8qcyPgyMQef7VwoCQKFz4n1DR CzwHlsczJvTUF6ZR00aGkoqOZUM85HFBs0Hsdq3OolR3xJFJPKx6pOXdihVXBwdmmh/b b1cruQKB5VjGvmYsa5Mdt5O3L3dgoD98Qnjbxsl0/eTwhAjgo7RwcKVMmSKmBEic0Sb6 xQ9joYkGGOVzluws+2hV+aHkKtX2kXX2DIafiOEU/O0ENerYA7AxOe5X9CYONtzo5Ent RKkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8HNFE+FMkLt1sLvKZD0UHj4evL/3tNsZTlKx/wDfBNA=; b=kyPVEJQa1fCnTqLpdEoOKs7j6KMYNLHxD9D+AgxhRv8pH3l1TcI7QfkBF6PrnA4bvA 8yt/smz+U5izp+qrEkjvEd30cP0Kws5rXurya//YR5qcDRlkmDGh0cQlm+GWlSpBpcA/ e8CWnuxFhe6tkRxCZ4pMWZY+STgNXUQLJ36au/b8pvzPVZlAxhzPbmz5orBatDaRK8p6 h4/zuiDL5TGqBifjzS0DCGW0lV0gr/0Ex+I7QXepM0R0K1Jl/WeMtVgNDnYUTrplantO bKmGO/kWsnfOAKsgnUNLLIDOKlQwXX57MJyg97dML25+HD4FsD73nMbJMXHAHSKuLUeM EWSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533oyO4eBBmAdSK4te3A6L4JyEz4rZxoR+KLkx1i6Avgy06DOT8A fDm0n7zLMIXJCk0Yma5qLcZymrZkzUSQ2mEARJnaNu2u
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLnFMleX5TtYpRm0jUehag4KqgnlQ5dB6+fE72OU3ACQ52ljXqXwU1sxZjO2TTu43DCpwXTAwGNmR5oD1CCKY=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:550:0:b0:249:7e41:aba8 with SMTP id 77-20020a2e0550000000b002497e41aba8mr6970874ljf.201.1648652009578; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Yj2d4DJMFWJOxoZa@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <317196df-3363-36c9-2421-02d9e229f664@joelhalpern.com> <CO1PR11MB488130CFF42A9F309AE1E212D81A9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <95b5dab0-3eb5-536d-85fc-d428f26364ed@joelhalpern.com> <CABcZeBOSMRffY6cXjwn7A6d=JWDJmmBrgHxiPD-XRMTMazOjLw@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR11MB48812B0C5B88C190FB4A28ECD81D9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <7042bc99-5d14-993c-198b-1080b4ff5636@gmail.com> <CH0PR02MB8291A7A9598871412C035882D61E9@CH0PR02MB8291.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <39A3A9C9-5EED-4E44-9695-6186C5A3F7AC@akamai.com> <5abeddcf-1209-1dd1-a9c3-221ad1b78d98@gmail.com> <2fd7c18f-f4e2-374c-b852-8b12fef0f033@joelhalpern.com> <E0F6BFF3-CB79-4721-A69A-5847DAC6CBC3@akamai.com> <e957bd2c-4d90-a32b-8825-39c1d015dbba@joelhalpern.com> <E5A01BD0-98FA-46C1-B03A-A6356BFA4654@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <E5A01BD0-98FA-46C1-B03A-A6356BFA4654@akamai.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:53:18 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+H0zA7ggwJ61_5jAU70gSqisTxq2j41h==Yt2=N3FF+Rg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/5IgWFlhQJBaRgariT4XBCyAyscA>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Tao [3rd party SDO cross-referencing of IETF work (was: Re: Chair/datatracker tracking expired WG documents ?)]
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5076155394757452718=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

+1 to convey the "sense" of the IETF, if that is still possible.

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:46 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz=
40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Shrug, we disagree. If we haven't found the text that appears on the
> front-matter of every single draft to be compelling enough, then adding
> more words to an overview document will not change things.  YMMV, which is
> shorthand for we're not going to change each other's minds.
>
> Neither list here is the appropriate discussion forum, so I'll stop now
> and point to https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss or the
> more likely to be useful https://github.com/ietf/tao/issues/44
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email