[rfc-i] xref to "References" section
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 23 November 2016 05:08 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA7C1294C8
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:08:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id RKrul9aL1wFK
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:08:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05FA7129429
for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>;
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:08:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE824B817B9;
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:08:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987BBB817B9
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:08:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id e78xTGDTrUjD for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>;
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:08:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de
(mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A0AB817B8
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:08:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de
(submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b])
by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
uAN587QY001920
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 06:08:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.102] (p5DC7E34C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
[93.199.227.76])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id
3tNr2H41Bsz8HkV; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 06:08:07 +0100 (CET)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 501570486.760801-f4939e2863d1269a2c4b713114f3d49f
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 06:08:06 +0100
Message-Id: <493309A6-A90E-4525-BDDB-2E81287460C4@tzi.org>
To: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Subject: [rfc-i] xref to "References" section
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions."
<rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
There is an interesting issue on kramdown-rfc: https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629/issues/31 <references> does not allow an `anchor` attribute in RFC 7749, and XML2RFC enforces this. In any case, use of this attribute would allow xrefs to “Informative References”/“Normative References”, but not to “References”, a section that is now generated automatically. Any idea how to solve this with RFCXML? Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] xref to "References" section Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] xref to "References" section Julian Reschke