[rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.12 <br>"
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org (Paul Hoffman) Wed, 11 May 2016 00:24 UTC
From: paul.hoffman at vpnc.org (Paul Hoffman)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 17:24:04 -0700
Subject: [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.12 <br>"
In-Reply-To: <059dd459-ea6f-4299-7458-9f222a40554b@gmx.de>
References: <059dd459-ea6f-4299-7458-9f222a40554b@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <C66B533E-E030-40F9-AB4B-62F1CDEF2A6A@vpnc.org>
On 9 May 2016, at 6:00, Julian Reschke wrote: > <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-iab-xml2rfc-03.html#rfc.section.2.12>: > > "2.12 <br> > > Indicates that a line break should be inserted in the generated output > by a formatting tool. It is always expressed as <br />. Multiple > successive instances of this element do not cause blank lines to > appear in the output, and is thus not useful. > > This element appears as a child element of <td> (Section 2.56) and > <th> (Section 2.58). > > Content model: this element does not have any contents." > > Question: I assume this is here because splitting the cell's content > into multiple <t>s would create too much vertical whitespace? Correct. There is sometimes a need for just a break, not a blank line. > Other than that: > > - What is "It is always expressed as <br />" about? So that we do not have the common problem in HTML that people use <br> unclosed. > - "Multiple successive instances of this element do not cause blank > lines to appear in the output, and is thus not useful." -- maybe "are > not useful" - or just state that they'll be ignored? Good call: ignored. > What if there's whitespace in between, such as with "<br/> <br/>"? Yeeps. That would indeed be a way to insert blank lines in a cell. I guess we should allow that in order not to create an arms war with people who want blank lines in their cells. Proposed: Multiple successive instances of this element are ignored. Successive instances with an intervening white space (such as "<br /> <br />") will create a single blank line. On 9 May 2016, at 11:36, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2016-05-09 20:26, Miek Gieben wrote: >> If people feel we *do* need it, then why not allow it everywhere in >> document? > > AFAIR, there *is* a use case for line breaks in table cells, but not > anywhere else. I agree with Julian here. Table cells seem special in the way we communicate. --Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.12 <br>" Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.12 <br>" Miek Gieben
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.12 <br>" Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.12 <br>" Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.12 <br>" Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.12 <br>" Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.12 <br>" Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "2.12 <br>" Paul Hoffman