IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 02 December 2016 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B481295CF for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 00:51:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G6QPc8LtGSVF for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 00:51:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09D9112959D for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 00:51:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCB4B80104; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 00:51:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B2EB80102; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 00:51:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qr7AmSB8abTq; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 00:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F2B1B80101; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 00:51:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id uB28pJqJ002734; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:51:19 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (58.145.115.87.dyn.plus.net [87.115.145.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id uB28pGw3002719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:51:17 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)'" <rse@rfc-editor.org>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 08:51:13 -0000
Message-ID: <04f701d24c79$3df584e0$b9e08ea0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQD/MAIDCqg09qsDEZWdwf52bWDza6Kaj/mA
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22736.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--15.545-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--15.545-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: zGP2F0O7j/vW/bDrA6VrLeYAh37ZsBDCt3aeg7g/usAM74Nf6tTB9riN d7CXjOinINAJ/M2fVv1YkM3PhIuhwB3ZJC2sAO0hKWuiyZLRI4ALitYSIrUiBxjhgZmcUTl/H9d YEuRTt+6QGyY1jpXvNKbrRMceiKO6wUAA94l37xSOjIrMSa2sR8MdI0UcXEHzeF9re6uQ5xX36x IGbTm5O8If7jd19b8p/Sj/WnCM/LNNfs8n85Te8v7E6GNqs6ceavP8b9lJtWr6C0ePs7A07QKmA RN5PTKc
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Thanks for this Heather,

> If you have suggestions or recommendations, please add them as an issue
> in github.

No, it's alright, I'll just raise them in an email (this email) for discussion
on the mailing list as normal so other only have to look in one place for the
conversation :-)

1. You have some embedded code fragments. Is it your intention that these will
still be visibly marked <CODE BEGINS> and <CODE ENDS>?

2. It would be lovely if you could address the "Contributors" section (current
schema means that the section has to be created by hand). An "obvious" solution
is allow a new 'role' value of 'contributor' in 'author' and pull that out into
the separate section.

Thanks,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email