IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [Rsoc] Archival format to rfc-interest and the IAB

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Fri, 21 February 2020 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2119C1208B0 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:41:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EuN-h0-agNOk for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:41:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8099012082D for <rfc-interest-archive-SieQuei0be@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:41:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B36F4071F; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:40:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8677F4071F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:40:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZfv2ef7qMnn for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:40:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29015F4071A for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:40:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 42833 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2020 16:40:57 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=a74f.5e500819.k2002; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=cQRnry2+IXN3pIbCv2qjVjDB+r48K72ZPVsevbnaX3o=; b=sKB3Q1Cb8obFD16A5IhLQfVvkNO7baLDCY3x88cR8UEu+Guf7hRTMD6JSeP9vA1AHWM8q5YTUJdpqSogOUrMwQ+9szjIX6wb8XPlrwfOjuOVCQ+sJxykUJOjTZcB1r4ITIC6d0qllxeq0F2wXAsu1LyU0+JeUZYsjKfrwgSmioa9BoxTiycn9uvauqPIFBFUX6uGHqup6N7jkUne4o5JJRYfM35oPm2in7weUpOUCr1bqSshhPkSecjZ4V4xKEVQ
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 21 Feb 2020 16:40:57 -0000
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:40:55 -0800
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2002210838240.88568@ary.local>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1d6af0d5-a2c2-b239-43fd-7c937f06ccb2@gmail.com>
References: <57ce444e-4ee9-26c5-9e76-ae6906e69159@gmail.com> <52BA75DF-6D58-4BF1-953F-1911F301DB20@encrypted.net> <8f3e62b9-03ff-9fc2-bef9-a341ce7ca897@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMBm7dH05mks2mREWO+n4A+f_m=MBC6pEicp=VVrmg6VKA@mail.gmail.com> <4e426227-a7b6-b4d0-8333-aa92d679f03b@mozilla.com> <1d6af0d5-a2c2-b239-43fd-7c937f06ccb2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (OSX 407 2020-02-09)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [Rsoc] Archival format to rfc-interest and the IAB
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, RSOC <rsoc@iab.org>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On Fri, 21 Feb 2020, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>> This is a question ultimately about the formats in the RFC series, not
>>> the IPR conditions under which they are licensed.
>>
>> Yes. Specifically, a concern that we could end up with documents in
>> multiple (de-facto) formats.

Right, with the question being whether to go back and fix the coding (not 
the text) or explicitly decide to live with it.

It's not totally clear to me who makes the final decision here.  IAB? 
IETF consensus?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email