Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
Dan York <york@isoc.org> Thu, 01 December 2016 20:54 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF36F129C9F for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:54:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.986
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=isoc.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IO67qMITPojX for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:54:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D940F129D72 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:45:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FE9B80111; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:45:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4CEB80111; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:45:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isoc.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O31pv5FzaU_R; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:45:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03on0049.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.42.49]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4A45B80110; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:45:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isoc.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-isoc-org; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Q6zgJhYlX5jDGjK+J60c7eGKfOQCmDChffloCmwjZgE=; b=LJaL/i1TV1hFhZjr26+Xd3yEsznGFqF1IODwAMpKyFiMW/p0yxe0YZOQlQuqXyWOWraightVPLazAC5SQMR6+D54xTAQQ2zecUhAG8RAAYWH9TKGUwhVVKoGU/nCHKJ44dO01FwcWUO4UPCwFfemP4RQXFhe6Z2OgaxF2sAHJbo=
Received: from CY1PR0601MB1657.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.163.232.19) by CY1PR0601MB1657.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.163.232.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.747.13; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:45:43 +0000
Received: from CY1PR0601MB1657.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.232.19]) by CY1PR0601MB1657.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.232.19]) with mapi id 15.01.0747.018; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:45:43 +0000
From: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
Thread-Topic: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
Thread-Index: AQHSTAgmwH0KG/obKUiVYUA2SkewfKDzj7SA
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 20:45:43 +0000
Message-ID: <EFC16970-559B-4813-A2FB-74D672FB488F@isoc.org>
References: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=york@isoc.org;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [74.69.229.215]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 76c7a057-0726-4619-0edf-08d41a2b0524
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001); SRVR:CY1PR0601MB1657;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0601MB1657; 7:gSrCT05TrZd05jWWm7uKv0yZsPFVZ+qjaGkt4H3y/yfXMTCgqR6mpnklG2paB8C0lh7/zgu/FbsRlvStGJg+sRLowcCI9CG7hmvox8e4+VDrtO2yZEzJ9hmMxEvql/haDBt+t8CcI98TbG6dp850arJIGFPWouyhQG4f13KK+yzDwjy9/qr8kcPkSlz1cxotuMKUHlGxNKM3957YyrgaOfTvkrfoDFu23h5VEyQiSB72VmB88gSzJlYf0LbbwmR0uTntimuyVXfp7HiPwIoZ9pE5mbhtQmPTcC8vfCKJznUk/AU/1o5HKDjO5noMkjAwYe46oBaOu2hu+m4gRNgjirTFQUrHin6K0jNwta+cFUy3ogKiiD0qwjF4zTCad3hRdmG9lV4AVtJ6ONjS5EuCNTZVYROUpaylTCM9U4ApI+y8eSW9xfTaH+AzVRhhgX0u2Ysjn/myyUd7kI7A2jCIdQ==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR0601MB16574AFA4BB557FBD4814095B78F0@CY1PR0601MB1657.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(31418570063057);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(6072148); SRVR:CY1PR0601MB1657; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0601MB1657;
x-forefront-prvs: 014304E855
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(7916002)(189002)(377454003)(199003)(24454002)(189998001)(110136003)(450100001)(82746002)(8676002)(5660300001)(122556002)(39450400002)(15395725005)(3660700001)(229853002)(6486002)(54356999)(66066001)(83716003)(76176999)(7846002)(7906003)(50986999)(39410400001)(92566002)(3280700002)(77096006)(7736002)(102836003)(6916009)(6116002)(86362001)(105586002)(106116001)(99286002)(2900100001)(2906002)(4326007)(97736004)(2950100002)(101416001)(606004)(36756003)(33656002)(38730400001)(81166006)(106356001)(81156014)(8936002)(68736007)(6512004)(6506004)(3846002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0601MB1657; H:CY1PR0601MB1657.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: isoc.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Dec 2016 20:45:43.5455 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 89f84dfb-7285-4810-bc4d-8b9b5794554f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0601MB1657
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2893088963158698322=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
Heather, On Dec 1, 2016, at 2:21 PM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) <rse@rfc-editor.org<mailto:rse@rfc-editor.org>> wrote: Sample document: https://rfc-format.github.io/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/sample.html Very nice! I like what I see. One minor thing I like is how the TOC will be fixed over on the right side if your window is large enough, but then goes back into the flow of the document if you shrink the window. Very nice touch! If you have suggestions or recommendations, please add them as an issue in github. I will. Don't have time today to spend more than the quick scan, but will try to do so. If you have time and interest, you can be of even more assistance by creating additional sample files according to the HTML spec so that the CSS developer has more content to test against. I might have a few cycles next week to help here, but need a bit more guidance on what you need. How do you want these files created? Very cool to see all this, Dan -- Dan York Senior Content Strategist, Internet Society york@isoc.org<mailto:york@isoc.org> +1-802-735-1624 Jabber: york@jabber.isoc.org<mailto:york@jabber.isoc.org> Skype: danyork http://twitter.com/danyork http://www.internetsociety.org/
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Dan York
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Russ Housley
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Adrian Farrel
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Yoav Nir
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Joe Hildebrand
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Russ Housley
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… Larry Masinter
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Julian Reschke