Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 27 May 2022 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49002C183F93 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2022 11:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653676709; bh=RB7QmD/gDIvV1JOP6bFX8YpdEln2MXBlFWa4cdng8UU=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=jycGk4bwAMpdbVoXYrPG2ZrJaaNpuMWKujQ8aPGXanOx4I+TpEuCR7tMNDbqmhyH2 rysyiyo2Sy+COUoIWKV8pB7FaPns5BlAoHGJ1/t07+KjYN8tRRtdcAz7jzS81DY4Q1 EU1JpwuM35ZrBX2o7quOW35re6YZvTh2wq+p0OAg=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri May 27 11:38:29 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1A4C15AE16; Fri, 27 May 2022 11:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653676709; bh=RB7QmD/gDIvV1JOP6bFX8YpdEln2MXBlFWa4cdng8UU=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=jycGk4bwAMpdbVoXYrPG2ZrJaaNpuMWKujQ8aPGXanOx4I+TpEuCR7tMNDbqmhyH2 rysyiyo2Sy+COUoIWKV8pB7FaPns5BlAoHGJ1/t07+KjYN8tRRtdcAz7jzS81DY4Q1 EU1JpwuM35ZrBX2o7quOW35re6YZvTh2wq+p0OAg=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4A2C15AE16 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2022 11:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=BAK/y5Kl; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=eD/Vfmh5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r0zTD6qbFOkr for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2022 11:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F778C159A23 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 27 May 2022 11:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20061 invoked from network); 27 May 2022 18:38:18 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=4e5a.62911a9a.k2205; bh=zMDgg8g035sPAl7aYEhVBJs7Wilw97MbVF02CL+oF/w=; b=BAK/y5KlcdhVnPgHmG1jXQnNu2+mwvlJzED3GGs3t78WGGEmMMTGZpfW233pgX5mycx2FUWNa24CKDQW7u3IonkPFMgAPWkWvXttAZZeRfFYHBCsTMsVsFNyAS/xEdWyBwHyGRwo1bgmFnqED34Ra+b3jiqo49MYL4PEJ0RSuGywp5dKlZLNXgPgGSKwCLbD8g/lV8FxQjfNDEibfB2KGV5lMpv33FEsgbvelsuMlWWWM/SYPvQCTPNqpVUW3/9Za6mQf/Un3bkBSaMfVRfuOJocIlT4YqqUohn0Jm2LUzvdkXN7G8yNJHaP5mNyWxPT/v14aHDWyjf6nQvbqJTtfw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=4e5a.62911a9a.k2205; bh=zMDgg8g035sPAl7aYEhVBJs7Wilw97MbVF02CL+oF/w=; b=eD/Vfmh5hlkbzP4aWLMCQPbVfbhzgy88aeMiiSV530d0TFq8ATePdLvZuCpucAIVQ9E72G+718tTpPHm6JPVe9x/ESRZO6BY8VtfUwqtHw4wENrEhBpZ9m8mWYNDpqZrkQ787wZOYx+jLZQQVhgwZyf1AAkAwq6ufPMFKjU18ZV0eSeWDNBUQ8ZrtGwcza7mHOM8CTbxTTqRtMPz1vMTbSwP5lffQgd1XtcMahKYoV1OlMnMhvScM7kH+A0veWW6ts+UD/BbMuQK3lygimLV6WecWFLALwXjX3NcDlLrxSAwEUddXlYvGnHk+7/NL2aBxob/CLsrbVtO4+022FGcfg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 27 May 2022 18:38:18 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 64DC141C605A; Fri, 27 May 2022 14:38:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA7C41C603C; Fri, 27 May 2022 14:38:17 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 14:38:17 -0400
Message-ID: <50d9b6b8-6bf5-7380-b311-666fee91cf45@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <C7A43071-9251-4281-9835-E179C1E2B39A@akamai.com>
References: <20220525203826.8606A41A4E93@ary.qy> <f0f92d4c-8cc4-c3bb-0f0d-96c3ad422303@gmx.de> <C826D239-7CCB-404E-9591-B33C34ED82C9@tzi.org> <5afe0f29-ab5a-b79e-cad4-7c18cf8fc5d3@gmx.de> <0ab66d2e-aa7d-eb17-83dc-2774e9d021a7@taugh.com> <27659.1653660447@localhost> <d603174c-db26-4fcb-0a60-a1f8b714c951@taugh.com> <29605.1653666740@localhost> <88f7f0a7-be8b-cefe-1ee7-2b8a158cc788@taugh.com> <C7A43071-9251-4281-9835-E179C1E2B39A@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/8UXBBsL65xGy-94r7Q9a6BBdNDw>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On Fri, 27 May 2022, Salz, Rich wrote:
> Since the RPC knows what the RFC number will be, having the tools add
> 	<meta name="source" content="https://rfc-editor/rfc/420/">
> Seems pretty simple.  I do not know if it is worthwhile or not.  I am sure that the "source" isn't ideal :)

We could put in RFC 6596 canonical web links but I don't know if anything 
pays attention to them.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest