Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML
John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 25 May 2022 20:38 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C2CC07B7C7 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 13:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653511117; bh=FC959jzHYfIn9/5E80m+5I10hVafCENbIWaaYl4F+Qg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=oFmxvb+NPYILXhC6SmstNOBTozydeuSLbYp0nLpDIZw0wyXbCUzox4K3widOlDkaA mMum6kuuNbj6i5gOmO1INmRVLPgzKjl9xApQ+tIv+f6tAmSrgXR43ueWp6A6XwYLMt MdhKA7KZxhfTmLIw6ExBAlxLdcHp+HAnXH7aP2vA=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed May 25 13:38:37 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21119C07B7BD; Wed, 25 May 2022 13:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653511117; bh=FC959jzHYfIn9/5E80m+5I10hVafCENbIWaaYl4F+Qg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=oFmxvb+NPYILXhC6SmstNOBTozydeuSLbYp0nLpDIZw0wyXbCUzox4K3widOlDkaA mMum6kuuNbj6i5gOmO1INmRVLPgzKjl9xApQ+tIv+f6tAmSrgXR43ueWp6A6XwYLMt MdhKA7KZxhfTmLIw6ExBAlxLdcHp+HAnXH7aP2vA=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4460C07B7BD for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 13:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=SgkqvDHE; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=rv7e93W3
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BCQml_xjQRzI for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 13:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67109C1D34F1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 May 2022 13:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 62767 invoked from network); 25 May 2022 20:38:27 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=f52d.628e93c3.k2205; bh=0jO/lDBUo9M5k5BGhuIloCwPHSya4V6EXHZ1sy/oROY=; b=SgkqvDHE/TYZrjCKqXeBYlc/t99Dk9tdaWzC8LyWcmtmkq9tNtem38X4BOOCOIktIXPmc52YKJDCzrslCCX8v/eEKXTxSPv1bbcfikC4TJbeUNZqGWYnxcYITbgvbj8sVMO61mixRNWWGQBYAkEskT8SB8dwYe6R40wBOnyHO+Ze2gl4ClcVaa5MmnzMIekLYfu+2ncU1dLI+oJXSD+cojjIZrrV3QsCMemf8OaVG8GB1mgsX2UycEEqMncFF3d91a3FMs7YN194H126MBQ8p5MUheoMviaamILydb54WpCnlrmnBAtsD440XMnQJ1UJniESSTnq6kDmK7IIfJXtXw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=f52d.628e93c3.k2205; bh=0jO/lDBUo9M5k5BGhuIloCwPHSya4V6EXHZ1sy/oROY=; b=rv7e93W3NpjFyrXpzowNUz8HkkoxqUYFy9uxs5WDrR4VJ2tc7OCdjFNaWgn8R/vrsMrZBei1MaXKSEsN81kmrBmxHqjNJkWoB153ynT6ejm+eU5aRBXyxZ0DGW3s6A+RzWjxQm2ArjnPt8x3Vtm7xBDbfuaRYvT9oeezEZKZCSFz9elSRBW8Dn5Yi4+9lmNmAoI0XHWTy94S5AZ9JsMlyxxRofzXfAGDwE657NWCm1f9e270rWgA1Rs+OoKwe6rJOmtS4a/uJrpxX1uKEudgmF/SUU6b4pEyaocUVPpKV5sn/1CwlnA2F/qjZ3YtfeGGICHtMXzXVJCOOQRcW1TCyg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 25 May 2022 20:38:27 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8606A41A4E93; Wed, 25 May 2022 16:38:25 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 16:38:25 -0400
Message-Id: <20220525203826.8606A41A4E93@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Cc: julian.reschke@gmx.de
In-Reply-To: <d05d8a72-641a-84e5-8ead-641e0bff7a10@gmx.de>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/8zKx_2xGs5V1woYiR6MUFroHIjY>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
It appears that Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> said: >Am 25.05.2022 um 02:37 schrieb John R Levine: >> Ticket 757 is mine https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/issues/757 >> >> It asks for the meta tags that Google Scholar uses. I know these are the >> right tags because I added them to the HTML-ized versions of older RFCs >> which are now at long last showing up in Google Scholar. >> ... > >Are we sure that we need all of them? (It's quite a long list...) I'm not sure what "need" means here. These are tags that Scholar says it uses, and it's the ones we're putting on the pre-XML RFCs that Scholar is now indexing. R's, John _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML (f… John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML John Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML Larry Masinter
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML Michael Richardson
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML Michael Richardson
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML Salz, Rich
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML Eliot Lear
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] document dependence, was Meta decorat… John Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] document dependence, was Meta decorat… John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] document dependence, was Meta decorat… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML Jay Daley
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML John Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Meta decorations in generated HTML Martin J. Dürst