IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] whose on first

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 20 February 2021 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B4D3A0CCD; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:54:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNh5LAEL2Oki; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 873653A0CCC; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D64EF40767; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:54:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEC0F40767 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:54:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jw6nBFRJgi-Z for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:53:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD425F40764 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:53:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1lDZGK-0007ab-Rd; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 20:54:01 +0000
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:54:00 -0800
Message-ID: <m2v9amlatz.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <0F1C9566-D393-49AE-83C0-8362D8C8763A@att.com>
References: <m2wnv3n1sz.wl-randy@psg.com> <0F1C9566-D393-49AE-83C0-8362D8C8763A@att.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] whose on first
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group <xml2rfc@ietf.org>, RFC Interest Group <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

> My privileges on the machine where bibxml is hosted were also cut off,
> so I have not been able to debug or fix what is going on there.

effing brilliant.  as an old friend once told me

    When there is rot somewhere in the middle of the organization, that
    part can be sawed off and regrown.  When it is at the top, it
    descends.  A middle manager may be able to block it for a while; but
    eventually they break and the rot keeps descending.
      -- paraphrased from Tom DeMarco

if senior software engineers of the quality of the tools crew are
actually fungible, then why can $dayjob not fill two open reqs?

randy

---
randy@psg.com
`gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd randy@psg.com`
signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header mangling
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email