Re: [rfc-i] Hebrew contact information example in RFC 7997

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Sat, 21 January 2017 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6F8129408 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:49:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=3.599, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nQojzmEK0gom for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:49:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05EEB1293FC for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:49:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A783CB80343; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:49:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6D9B8194F; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:03:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mZk-1QK9jf05; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26113B8194B; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id c206so65158566wme.0; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:03:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=x7T/4c3l1qY4TAzkEjhXo2LatAtKzdx0CLAGB+50K40=; b=BW9vvBWvjJ/1R3PAOK6T0QlRJ69NyJ65DtIRsdGByLwtGFnDIbyyRLSx4KCbSbCPcF GeBYjECxT70CjEgU+bCMV5Bk/QBH5TUXeNwMW1g81X+qRdu9c6+KfnLyPLCcaf7UbHRR wPcLNXF0+HZpJJFoZ0LzswRFsru0gHqrlDKVgbSTjONeEa/3h+hLm93lwMqSgcN7laNF u7M9uKk9kShmSYP8l+sZ7bpK1XDgmOEWaMDegCJSK3cZ2a5JkRAMgMrzMNmOaYtA1n93 qPyZRWsRU224WL2ZKiW/4Kthlwsv864e9p5MuRDQFawZvHnNgEWWjSGNbnIkWLOGQT/B qrPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=x7T/4c3l1qY4TAzkEjhXo2LatAtKzdx0CLAGB+50K40=; b=fl+0kol3XKZIY8+t8ISpHx376SBYJ05X4YT2DGKpcqWHJe10xkFepIGMfbNKb5sLr8 oQdhOh5JjFodQC0Z5f0iyrOMSjn3iJv9SJbtmgXilE472t46MaiyKr5VnFV8SUS5Zi0N NCpXZwYYzZLuVBjYZTvNurDf4ynD9C1iHwGEAQh8lkgXYa3yrzHIw4d9gfbdigDKLBDS UWg21Fy8NcCNnwrn1F/oPl7gJV/nTKK3ibzEsgaBwHdTM99m4oRdeuUiKfHYsfCwo5XK akR+2/XCmzivvDFgBpJiWoPvRPA6BJp0/DgXf5OxEn48wK3bcSdKvIAh2TeAfHLazpU/ K5DQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLWNo+HWpdY9HZTgobx6cWlrXTYJsKWe3X8Kim/2ApY2sLAOVud7UWd25fRWynJgw==
X-Received: by 10.28.84.14 with SMTP id i14mr5230159wmb.51.1484949829395; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:03:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from RoniPC (bzq-79-179-3-94.red.bezeqint.net. [79.179.3.94]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r5sm7926764wme.23.2017.01.20.14.03.47 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:03:48 -0800 (PST)
From: "Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <480c6dfe-b590-abfa-0103-ac90641cd0f9@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <480c6dfe-b590-abfa-0103-ac90641cd0f9@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 00:03:40 +0200
Message-ID: <00ed01d27369$0f8e9ad0$2eabd070$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHzMtF/Ro0vYwpe+cSGWplQOD1IYqEAap0g
Content-Language: he
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:49:07 -0800
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Hebrew contact information example in RFC 7997
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: 'RSE' <rse@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi,
The PDF version - section 3.2 is OK
As for 3.9 the alignment is not perfect.  The first problem is that Hebrew is written left to right so typically we align to the left. This will probably look weird in an RFC so I would expect alignment to the right at least. As for the text itself it is OK in the pdf (not the one in the email)
As for the HTML version - the alignment is better but still the first line with my name is not aligned
This is how it would look aligned to the left


רוני אבן
וואווי
דוד המלך 14
תל אביב 64953
ישראל
Roni
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 9:40 AM
> To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> Cc: RSE; Roni Even
> Subject: Hebrew contact information example in RFC 7997
> 
> Hi,
> 
> the PDF version of RFC 7997
> (<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7997.pdf>) has this example (when copied
> character-wise into mail):
> 
> > Additional contact information:
> > רנו י א ן ב
> > ו ו א ו וי
> > 1 ד ו ד ה למ ך 4
> > 6 4 9 5 ת ל א ביב 3
> > י שר
> 
> The HTML version of the last published draft
> (<https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-iab-rfc-nonascii-02.html#n-
> address-information>)
> has:
> 
> > Alternate contact information:
> >    רוני אבן
> >   וואווי
> >   דוד המלך 14
> >   תל אביב 64953
> >   ישראל
> 
> Is this a glitch in the PDF or an intentional change?
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 
> PS: it doesn't really matter with respect to what the RFC is about, but I'd still like
> to know...

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest