Re: [rfc-i] CORRECTED RE: Handling of large code sections ...
Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Wed, 25 May 2022 23:48 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3939C3A3D49 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 16:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653522486; bh=7aR/Qd5BlL4ieg1jrn9JIWScTsf/Mt7+KIKq8tIkpfI=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=h7+Cw9VZf7mqn/LiSCzuDTrcTRIa9PA8D8EyUKU2bkAjUESu8o6vvy3Tbs30o6sRA smwcfvrSITVbTiqBLGwG+emJlIPYxQdqKNN9cmSOHCHDGSBJ4+K/KxvBY63DgOxN4U MW7bIlrzGHXA6tI0iUSQnfyowvwsNarCLY0SxWhQ=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed May 25 16:48:06 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B61C397F66; Wed, 25 May 2022 16:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1653522486; bh=7aR/Qd5BlL4ieg1jrn9JIWScTsf/Mt7+KIKq8tIkpfI=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=h7+Cw9VZf7mqn/LiSCzuDTrcTRIa9PA8D8EyUKU2bkAjUESu8o6vvy3Tbs30o6sRA smwcfvrSITVbTiqBLGwG+emJlIPYxQdqKNN9cmSOHCHDGSBJ4+K/KxvBY63DgOxN4U MW7bIlrzGHXA6tI0iUSQnfyowvwsNarCLY0SxWhQ=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E584C397F66 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 16:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.844
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.844 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w--lvjzT2plj for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 16:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD52AC397F64 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 May 2022 16:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id u30so38360478lfm.9 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 May 2022 16:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+RNTwj31lmmBbWgPTdu3uVHdOe7+bXN6RBASITFBczA=; b=R1y34y6kMguGpRpGlb5purKCzK0gNRiCqPCW+b0c3SlOZbcZixaZkJUNY0VIswGQx9 IGIfjGJoNEOeUx9XGdvnxqEkgC+dLU/C6ImSN1At1UWMl+TUGA7AGocMKjqjQZd7HD/M vDnSvMJl7U12ZrKTqJ1BI0kmka5WaeGlXouCd7/Vz0lpxSwvhmkNnrz2gEvwv9MMZ2Kx +efpTgC45NYmMsEIQg6dEbCJ1sHLrpALFoZthxO6Pr3PULcbLOdY55ok5tuASc/m6R9C NKndoTU/TWSU20XjibBK9VvcwK9zb1JWh0U3XmG/JtkrVZEF90biHT6KV+cOVQqrzPEU i4BA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+RNTwj31lmmBbWgPTdu3uVHdOe7+bXN6RBASITFBczA=; b=UMeI531xjZ+O0NZqnXBJAlM6JOOuv7yhu6dUjqfyF1FjL8vU2RgivMzngfV/dQCMRj Ok92cAX6LJeWCMk94zj/k2rgfArisdikwAfxPDMFTud1D9mhuHMUGk//f/Xm7TVTgBA8 eW0lwFDk+W9mhTuwq6NpDJJaVcFLWxs4F/kUu2I9NNfljgdgwvjvygV0GeeO1SVN/TIZ vErxmoGY99SZMVcrF4uw5Kf1a55W9JrTLSIOrt9cDg1KHpXRXIXKNyvaYmFCv8skyFQB efnIx3MuMh2gma7SNWpHmSOX80lDaHbyW6hKlAyS/UrEmBUf9sq/tmf231bjHJSEURkz uFfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531npc9jYKuIrtsJYdgKsDeiU2zT+9LCF2c0E8oQphUsCC1fgA9l Pu9DxAvl4eGKT6aqlJJx0OZYa0vPoXo6iJVUmkzAb6+5
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIoFwlulnj8brqDAcOwDplu+5qVqpCDMYjwFUQmCuR/peYWTjh13KSzCRsaJOb4mtu6qYC2VoMrPMSVjLC86o=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:592a:0:b0:477:b81b:4d13 with SMTP id v10-20020ac2592a000000b00477b81b4d13mr25115912lfi.140.1653522479109; Wed, 25 May 2022 16:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR11MB3757A5453DC664D0EA92CF34B9D69@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB3757A5453DC664D0EA92CF34B9D69@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 19:47:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHsS-3TvsGyLrJ_KK1uSXVwkp37_PEy+dqMdvsDFn5JiQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Paul Duffy (paduffy)" <paduffy=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/A4A1xEYdLCxh7m8FdOOg80uUk3Y>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] CORRECTED RE: Handling of large code sections ...
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0114897081348329669=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
I thought there were tools for extracting marked code from an RFC. If so, why does it make that much difference? Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e3e3@gmail.com On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:18 PM Paul Duffy (paduffy) <paduffy= 40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > > > *From:* rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org> *On Behalf Of *Paul > Duffy (paduffy) > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 25, 2022 5:15 PM > *To:* RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org> > *Subject:* [rfc-i] Handling of large code sections ... > > > > Folks > > > > Is it acceptable for a draft to externally reference large sections of > code (say, parked in Github) versus inlining into the draft? The FORMER > makes for easy access and input into the code’s respective tool chain, > versus messy cut/paste of the LATTER. > > > > Cheers > _______________________________________________ > rfc-interest mailing list > rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest >
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] CORRECTED RE: Handling of large code sect… Paul Duffy (paduffy)
- Re: [rfc-i] CORRECTED RE: Handling of large code … Jay Daley
- Re: [rfc-i] CORRECTED RE: Handling of large code … Joel Halpern
- Re: [rfc-i] CORRECTED RE: Handling of large code … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] CORRECTED RE: Handling of large code … Donald Eastlake