IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [Rfc-markdown] Problem with Kramdown tooling and figures?

Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> Wed, 08 June 2022 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCF9C15D895 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1654702940; bh=5gvuYZKtHpHJMPy3X1KsiwRB/x24RA1D1/IFLmRpE7Y=; h=From:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc; b=uBWRAOIL0NBhzvqr75oUycwnv/TM7oxpYDs5RZUD+0IvHeUTsISTlWQDWxmVysbtG zrcO/gUylyw46K+EMwAWAhOY5NimRVd1YcH41kcIhU1roB/I5w35jT/wLUCCJSwY2H C4ZikQE5Yfj2GA6CG9aIcgtIGWrAZfTgQHPQ7KGw=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Jun 8 08:42:20 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7FAC14CF18; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1654702940; bh=5gvuYZKtHpHJMPy3X1KsiwRB/x24RA1D1/IFLmRpE7Y=; h=From:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc; b=uBWRAOIL0NBhzvqr75oUycwnv/TM7oxpYDs5RZUD+0IvHeUTsISTlWQDWxmVysbtG zrcO/gUylyw46K+EMwAWAhOY5NimRVd1YcH41kcIhU1roB/I5w35jT/wLUCCJSwY2H C4ZikQE5Yfj2GA6CG9aIcgtIGWrAZfTgQHPQ7KGw=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFCCC14CF18 for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mhdz87wAcieV for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfx.amsl.com (ietfx.amsl.com [50.223.129.196]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 680A0C157B4C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfx.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542344053E24; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from ietfx.amsl.com ([50.223.129.196]) by localhost (ietfx.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m1rEQtPKY0aU; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (host-92-27-125-209.static.as13285.net [92.27.125.209]) by ietfx.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FB644053E20; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <9EC3D107-690E-4864-BAEC-28FE8AC23B54@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 16:41:39 +0100
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB3757BA2784B05C84477D9672B9A49@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Paul Duffy (paduffy)" <paduffy=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <MN2PR11MB37570F4603464349B5DFFE5AB9A59@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <5E5D4003-E3D8-49B2-B14D-5D4AC7ADA0A3@tzi.org> <MN2PR11MB3757F2B3467FA1B188A1294DB9A49@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <7FFFF173-7D5F-4000-BDD1-9B407767C48E@ietf.org> <MN2PR11MB375776E0FFAA1023CFE4334AB9A49@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <99D6215E-50DA-422C-96D1-50949951394D@ietf.org> <MN2PR11MB3757A781285E16B585A6F841B9A49@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR11MB375760E12BFCDEB0ABA516BAB9A49@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <28E28C6A-5C59-41AB-BB2C-A500CB48B89E@tzi.org> <MN2PR11MB3757BA2784B05C84477D9672B9A49@MN2PR11MB3757.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/AAwt7xY9WtesaMq1DU2W1ZE7ebM>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [Rfc-markdown] Problem with Kramdown tooling and figures?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "rfc-markdown@ietf.org" <rfc-markdown@ietf.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2861310499734185350=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>


> On 8 Jun 2022, at 16:26, Paul Duffy (paduffy) <paduffy=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Do I now understand correctly that any figures MUST include ASCII art for text rendering and MAY include SVG for PDF rendering?

You can you provide either or both though SVG only is not recommended.  If you haven’t seen it already, the new documentation has a whole page on diagrams drawn from previous rfc-editor.org <http://rfc-editor.org/> pages: https://authors.ietf.org/en/diagrams

Jay


> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 11:12 AM
> To: Paul Duffy (paduffy) <paduffy@cisco.com>
> Cc: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>; rfc-markdown@ietf.org; RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
> Subject: Re: [Rfc-markdown] [rfc-i] Problem with Kramdown tooling and figures?
> 
> On 2022-06-08, at 17:06, Paul Duffy (paduffy) <paduffy=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> ... results in the following XML …
> 
> This is the one I fixed in kramdown-rfc 1.6.11, just pushed.
> (I’m not sure how quickly that is going up on author-tools.)
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> Oh, and:
> 
>> FYI a quick kramdown test using a correct example from the templates…
> 
> The example is not “correct” as far as current xml2rfc usage goes: it does not have an ascii-art branch in the artset.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
exec-director@ietf.org


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email