IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] HTML version of xml documents

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 02 December 2016 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507F8129A22 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:24:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vILaQ7wgKJoO for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:24:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB7A7129A21 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:24:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877FCB808C2; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:24:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE78B808C2; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:24:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l3Vn6ByVfiAn; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE2B1B808C0; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id uB2IPIfi000828 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:25:18 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1480703118; bh=TRS+LIDmDqPVliMn/2nFiRRQEAAkflkKehCa95E1z7A=; h=Subject:To:References:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=kLz3lFHhI7GiKbfNBd6lWVtvVk9aDyBQD70FKkhXEIWkgMfknKrpj1jtlkxsIvfl0 QX22VshbPi86XwgXouZNEIqdmwsGujwe5MKSOX/DCRl3BU3XNbbU/u8g5c+EwSi9E2 8mxD49leK+mFepaLx6d2HWYAZHNsS1ZK3EhXnLTs=
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <522c7563-ae0e-67b7-315a-604de1d961fd@dcrocker.net> <51c2caef-5bb0-35aa-4480-a686857c5ad9@rfc-editor.org>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <6b84d840-58db-ab93-ce2e-e6839ed84144@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:24:08 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <51c2caef-5bb0-35aa-4480-a686857c5ad9@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] HTML version of xml documents
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 12/1/2016 11:36 AM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> You're going to provisionally approve of the new CSS. I'm sure you'll
> have more immediate suggestions when you do. :-)

I'm tempted to ask what provisions I'll be asserting, demanding, or...? 
But that would be distracting...


> Evaluate spacing before heading, so it is not excessive. Evaluate heading font size, so it isn't too large. Consider non-black (dark) color for heading text. (eg, dark blue.)

Anyhow, I do see the CSS thread and have lodged an 'issue' in the git 
tracker:

      Evaluate spacing before heading, so it is not excessive. Evaluate 
heading font size, so it isn't too large. Consider non-black (dark) 
color for heading text. (eg, dark blue.)


Current spacing for the top-level headings seems excessive.  Font size 
also seems too large.

But yeah, overall, quite nice!

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email