IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Lamenting clusters...

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 18 May 2022 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC30C1850C0 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2022 13:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1652907231; bh=YgfWOtaQVQ6TUWlRoSr4us/KBVcDyYYuN6mIPP3zYYE=; h=From:To:cc:In-reply-to:References:Date:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=gEcNdqk/HGQUX/EOPuE8HeiO8LxEAnT0bkKf4mYAkzbg84iSFdUTFgj/MTuX6ZbBy ZuBc2HXvv9tUzZ10Jyaig6SI2FvA40URYctnZLL6Sh6fKSKlIlgeOASG7d787gXOsv DSx+54GUEihomemiMIX/eXbXEAhsOwfBYSRZmVUo=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed May 18 13:53:51 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54332C18353B; Wed, 18 May 2022 13:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1652907231; bh=YgfWOtaQVQ6TUWlRoSr4us/KBVcDyYYuN6mIPP3zYYE=; h=From:To:cc:In-reply-to:References:Date:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=gEcNdqk/HGQUX/EOPuE8HeiO8LxEAnT0bkKf4mYAkzbg84iSFdUTFgj/MTuX6ZbBy ZuBc2HXvv9tUzZ10Jyaig6SI2FvA40URYctnZLL6Sh6fKSKlIlgeOASG7d787gXOsv DSx+54GUEihomemiMIX/eXbXEAhsOwfBYSRZmVUo=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35527C18353B for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2022 13:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n1gh7fLjWUpg for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2022 13:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D256BC18353A for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 18 May 2022 13:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [5.148.108.162]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9ED1F479; Wed, 18 May 2022 20:53:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 518F31A01DD; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:53:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
In-reply-to: <46621756-BEC7-4321-868D-0DA83F2B137A@tzi.org>
References: <46621756-BEC7-4321-868D-0DA83F2B137A@tzi.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> message dated "Wed, 18 May 2022 17:34:15 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 16:53:43 -0400
Message-ID: <659830.1652907223@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/AufEfUMqpskIpoDSHo4D_8Vvi6w>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Lamenting clusters...
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0431352632988806772=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    > “Teaches me not even to have an informative reference to a spec that
    > informatively references another spec that normatively references a
    > not-yet-published spec.”

Does doing this result in being in cluster with that spec?


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-




_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email