[rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts
julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke) Fri, 12 February 2016 16:28 UTC
From: julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke)
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:28:36 +0100
Subject: [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts
In-Reply-To: <56BDFD7B.4020803@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20160211173901.28789.59265.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
<56BDFD7B.4020803@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <56BE0834.9030406@gmx.de>
On 2016-02-12 16:42, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > > Hello all, > > In case you missed yesterday's post to regarding the status of the > format documents, they are now out for community comment. Please send > comments of support, concern, or other feedback to the IAB > (iab at iab.org). If you have never posted to that list, it will be > temporarily held in moderation until your address can be put on the > white list. > > Discussion on specific drafts or requests for clarification can always > be sent here to rfc-interest or to the draft authors. > > Thank you for your time and interest, > Heather Sending feedback to the IAB list apparently means that it will only be visible to IAB members. That seems like a very bad idea for public review. Best regards, Julian
- [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
- [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Andrew Sullivan
- [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
- [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Andrew Sullivan