IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Epub format tools

Joe Hildebrand <hildjj@cursive.net> Thu, 01 December 2016 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20DE1294F1 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:11:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=cursive.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2i2MbkEVUhdq for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:11:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506A212952F for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:11:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040B9B81D49; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:11:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EE7B80904 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:26:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=cursive.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oJcO1sCYboed for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:26:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3C7AB80903 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:26:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id c21so346325459ioj.1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:26:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cursive.net; s=google; h=from:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=X+6wjzJ/CCz4AEQTyZ1jWwMetUZDtavLOnSX7C3Wdqo=; b=Og8rmLyjR3jD9LbPfOXEBB1m0cNa8+JDKi/7uVCrF2BCIFFHwS2JSq+BCPwmAW5iU3 okiUhmsAY0krVRGP8TLxltleTsZEyXOOZ9LlSihbXpg/11zEPuvYtF0Z1c/aXYhvvk8T B+1IaAbg5/YfrJmhczqN2inRJHcZw5jcorJZc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=X+6wjzJ/CCz4AEQTyZ1jWwMetUZDtavLOnSX7C3Wdqo=; b=Ltg6g+CEWFg/IRryCDRzc6mp96sICn/WnlmoySlA//z0RqTajot7PRCLXGY8uU8Q7X W+NLCyX46efHdvAgKdWupfuf8XTgifU3k5RrpGo57gmfXxLvtBqmmdtqD/TW1WX0o97i G8CdSbIL6V/QnKuwAOmPw+Ck4CMNiyGl5KBi73LsNrZkUwrzR7GQRQcNLzY57R2cFEwh X+qEs5PUrETMYAV/vcoxqlDMKHPfP30zGgsnXtOu98pHwze17D8tmzy68crVYcoIaWwf VaF/hLdwux5MjE+CuQvXXNdfJGsysK7f3F9YZhRGdmuDB3Cqri3P8vBwKli8PZXnvoEZ cfFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03Fx5cO7dPxGrqOpHW94nhflSVPMdEAVEH9LUE4pM4mTuJNh8/+c7m4OzTML+l2fg==
X-Received: by 10.107.146.196 with SMTP id u187mr28359995iod.34.1480537558716; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:25:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:282:204:2ddc:cdff:1e94:e862:eddb? ([2601:282:204:2ddc:cdff:1e94:e862:eddb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x63sm23927818iod.5.2016.11.30.12.25.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:25:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Joe Hildebrand <hildjj@cursive.net>
X-Google-Original-From: Joe Hildebrand <joe@cursive.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwjhiYVfL-gJtVErv=OmiYJvWSdbAq0TBEqT+P25tFjqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:25:57 -0700
Message-Id: <C5DBE7BA-D5B4-4890-BCEF-2C65747F1A6E@cursive.net>
References: <CAMm+LwiPYuvnYkGmxt51-osVwGzak6SVvsNrfNOUXMO8LFQ4dw@mail.gmail.com> <7B942896-8F81-4EC0-AB4D-A232FEA5ADC7@att.com> <CAMm+LwgdqVtXQJNSrM1ovPTq5zi_NvddN=-b=WOvXh10fJoo7g@mail.gmail.com> <059a8209-9998-e101-bbab-c8820c75b88e@gmx.de> <CAMm+LwjhiYVfL-gJtVErv=OmiYJvWSdbAq0TBEqT+P25tFjqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 08:11:12 -0800
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Epub format tools
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

> On Nov 22, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
> 
> ​We don't seem to be getting there very fast. ​At the current rate of progress and given the resources currently available, I don't expect to be able to use the new format till 2020.

The RFP is out for bid, and we expect a vendor selection imminently. Starting over with any other (even existing) toolset will certainly set us back by at least 2 years, perhaps more.

-1 to starting over from scratch at this point.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email