IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Tao [3rd party SDO cross-referencing of IETF work (was: Re: Chair/datatracker tracking expired WG documents ?)]

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> Wed, 30 March 2022 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334ED3A080B for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1648650175; bh=cjdzi3kC1bFvbU7JHfytjn/g3EpURiJ17XkyKdOsHac=; h=To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Cc:From; b=bBOAXeebNDxj4f870qDTy1wdoGWO7eggYAcvl6X/tA4tZRV0000vTKyCCmD5qNwO9 mRooAhRkn99XkhOYCfaB8F4DqGulRY9Z9IvqHAkvluTPfiVdHCMnKBWahRuDphAG0Y 4haJTZP8u7Hkyf9AF/1tPCyhe424fz1H+khAaQSk=
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838573A07B5; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1648650160; bh=cjdzi3kC1bFvbU7JHfytjn/g3EpURiJ17XkyKdOsHac=; h=From:To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc; b=gSXpZrBNK81F6ZGjNsVkN7vjQW5MtkEZ1WzARzUwST/p03o0/6ZC6Qz0cMuNKrjMv 1/mCPXloRLZHeHBT0Ym3DWRey1Zu6vi5W7za7+7yXoqtWrfp5JPwWe55Ra9XSd055I tb8BtYLhHjYXjIw4lDfq81n7zU8cxstBnfB0Tymo=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08773A073D for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VPADb2_ly2q for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB6AB3A064E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with ESMTP id 22UDrVhi028036; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:22:24 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=LHoKbsrFGMzAHDwAq4SKrDJpP+xdHkW35GV0utdpl6M=; b=blh/R5B/EjuSq17t7nu11cGW3xOZwg1AYy7MOlgM/u9z/XQZqX55vLGJMVxE5vpAQH9P XV1K87qgDJcp4UYWBj869PkXEmOC1Xc3FoPyqxvyai/vxPmIxAuKE9+uGWenpcm7+XoD G8GIPJC7vvH0nzaABrzEX2C788+23P/eClFwydonL5R7SlZr4W3F1iQtus6BXb2zM1JZ QfYZKchbhkRyxl3Ms7gd0gy9rhzpHXMPYDpkIR1nLY9mYLUaxsdYiYQunC1+gLOtOehs R9frv85w50P33PPI2fydYzhsTc1sxZJbFwFvEkETuY2ZDJpambREJ3PauOq7VJefWimP Tg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint6 (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [184.51.33.61] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3f4p7yceye-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:22:24 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 22UEK8i9027565; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:22:23 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3f3711461m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:22:22 -0400
Received: from usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) by usma1ex-dag4mb7.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.986.5; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:22:22 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.32; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:22:22 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.033; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:22:22 -0400
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Tao [3rd party SDO cross-referencing of IETF work (was: Re: Chair/datatracker tracking expired WG documents ?)]
Thread-Index: AQHYQ9FoaHIgrGRn6kqOhY5o7Em3AKzXXw8AgACccIA=
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:22:21 +0000
Message-ID: <E0F6BFF3-CB79-4721-A69A-5847DAC6CBC3@akamai.com>
References: <Yj2d4DJMFWJOxoZa@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <317196df-3363-36c9-2421-02d9e229f664@joelhalpern.com> <CO1PR11MB488130CFF42A9F309AE1E212D81A9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <95b5dab0-3eb5-536d-85fc-d428f26364ed@joelhalpern.com> <CABcZeBOSMRffY6cXjwn7A6d=JWDJmmBrgHxiPD-XRMTMazOjLw@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR11MB48812B0C5B88C190FB4A28ECD81D9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <7042bc99-5d14-993c-198b-1080b4ff5636@gmail.com> <CH0PR02MB8291A7A9598871412C035882D61E9@CH0PR02MB8291.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <39A3A9C9-5EED-4E44-9695-6186C5A3F7AC@akamai.com> <5abeddcf-1209-1dd1-a9c3-221ad1b78d98@gmail.com> <2fd7c18f-f4e2-374c-b852-8b12fef0f033@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <2fd7c18f-f4e2-374c-b852-8b12fef0f033@joelhalpern.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.59.22031300
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.850 definitions=2022-03-30_04:2022-03-29, 2022-03-30 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=863 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2203300071
X-Proofpoint-GUID: m1HpOLSadR_FDiU2HnVd_Sc5kDfpXbwt
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: m1HpOLSadR_FDiU2HnVd_Sc5kDfpXbwt
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.850,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-03-30_04,2022-03-30_01,2022-02-23_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=842 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2203300071
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/CC1Tn4BFrHx9Fd6mTp5yxHELb90>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Tao [3rd party SDO cross-referencing of IETF work (was: Re: Chair/datatracker tracking expired WG documents ?)]
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6275179898563418124=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>

Should the Tao be yet another definitive document on everything IETF, or should It be enough to convey the "sense" of the IETF? I am most definitively in the latter camp. I base this view on having given the newcomer's tutorial *MANY* times, been heavily involved with EMODIR and its predecessor for years, and having countless discussions with newcomers at various meet and greets, guides/mentors, etc.



I have copied Brian's comments into an issue which you can find at https://github.com/ietf/tao/issues/44





_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email