[rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts
julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke) Fri, 12 February 2016 16:49 UTC
From: "julian.reschke at gmx.de"
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:49:04 +0100
Subject: [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts
In-Reply-To: <56BE0C07.7070205@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20160211173901.28789.59265.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56BDFD7B.4020803@rfc-editor.org> <56BE0834.9030406@gmx.de> <56BE0C07.7070205@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <56BE0D00.3030805@gmx.de>
On 2016-02-12 17:44, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2/12/16 8:28 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 2016-02-12 16:42, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 > >> > >> > >> Hello all, > >> > >> In case you missed yesterday's post to regarding the status of the > >> format documents, they are now out for community comment. Please > >> send comments of support, concern, or other feedback to the IAB > >> (iab at iab.org). If you have never posted to that list, it will be > >> temporarily held in moderation until your address can be put on > >> the white list. > >> > >> Discussion on specific drafts or requests for clarification can > >> always be sent here to rfc-interest or to the draft authors. > >> > >> Thank you for your time and interest, Heather > > > > Sending feedback to the IAB list apparently means that it will only > > be visible to IAB members. That seems like a very bad idea for public > > review. > > > > But it seems to be how IAB stream documents are reviewed. See the > announcements, for example, for draft-iab-irtf-chair-descriptions and > draft-iab-rfc5741bis. If yo think the IAB process should change, that's > something to take up with the IAB. Maybe an open mic question at IETF 95? > > - -Heather As a data point, I only learned about rfc5741bis the day before it was supposed to be approved. Anyway, IAB procedures are an interesting topic; and I might ask if I'm there. Right now I want to make sure that I can actually see *all* feedback related to the rfc-design activity. That doesn't seem to be the case, and that's a major process failure. Best regards, Julian
- [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
- [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Andrew Sullivan
- [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
- [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts Andrew Sullivan