Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3

["Joel M. Halpern" <[e-mail]>]

Actually, gien the differences in rendition, documents (if we ever have 
such) about color or gray scale may be exactly when you do NOT want to 
use color and grayscale.  Slight mis-rendition could easily result in 
quite confusing documents.

Our initial agreement did include that we would revisit this.  And get 
publication expertise on the known problems in this space would be very 
helpful.  (We are not the first folks to wrestle with these issues.)

Yours,
Joel

On 12/18/2020 12:13 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> On 12/17/20 7:29 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> 
>> FWIW, while I don't generally think we ought to have our documents 
>> written in emojis, I do see some potentially valid reasons for them to 
>> appear, for instance if one was writing a document about the use of 
>> emojis.
> 
> Agree.
> 
> Similarly, I don't think we should totally ban graphics that contain 
> color or greyscale. There are good reasons to restrict that sort of 
> usage to make documents accessible to more people. But surely there are 
> exceptions. For instance a document that is explicitly concerned with 
> color and greyscale.
> 
>      Thanks,
>      Paul
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest