[rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-03, "9.2 <address>"

rse at rfc-editor.org (Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)) Tue, 05 July 2016 20:27 UTC

From: rse at rfc-editor.org (Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor))
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:27:52 -0700
Subject: [rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-03, "9.2 <address>"
In-Reply-To: <19D9868D-C5AD-4F80-8F5A-074873D31397@att.com>
References: <b26d0177-6041-6337-b78b-61023b4d2706@gmx.de> <9A7978E4-8FEB-4834-9A26-FC4FED311B7E@cisco.com> <19D9868D-C5AD-4F80-8F5A-074873D31397@att.com>
Message-ID: <0c732115-c8a5-8256-86c1-2b2a3182070a@rfc-editor.org>

On 7/5/16 1:14 PM, HANSEN, TONY L wrote:
> On 7/5/16, 4:00 PM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of jhildebr at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 1, 2016, at 4:32 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>>> ?
>> I'm fine with that.  Hold for document update; this shouldn't delay getting started on tooling, and has a minimal impact if we change it.
> Do we have a place, other than the author?s notes, where such items will be collected?
>
> 	Tony
>

I've been discussing setting up a tracker for this; right now, the items
are in email messages. Julian has been using the xml2rfc issue tracker,
which makes sense for some things given we don't have a better place
yet, but I don't think that's the right longer-term location for issues
and suggestions for the new format material.

-Heather