[rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-hoffman-xml2rfc-15.txt
julian.reschke at gmx.de (Julian Reschke) Sun, 01 February 2015 18:34 UTC
From: "julian.reschke at gmx.de"
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 19:34:51 +0100
Subject: [rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-hoffman-xml2rfc-15.txt
In-Reply-To: <54CDDE7D.5070308@gmx.de>
References: <20150109194426.30210.38594.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F015CCDE-6EF4-4AB7-ACB3-C4FC9026BD6F@vpnc.org> <54CD24C1.20707@seantek.com> <90D68D65-BBF8-4A4E-B432-94C07813EE5F@vpnc.org> <54CD31FD.3070200@seantek.com> <54CDDE7D.5070308@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <54CE71CB.4060305@gmx.de>
On 2015-02-01 09:06, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2015-01-31 20:50, Sean Leonard wrote: >> On 1/31/2015 11:32 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: >>> On Jan 31, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Sean Leonard<dev+ietf at seantek.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/9/2015 11:49 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: >>>>>> Name: draft-hoffman-xml2rfc >>>>>> Revision: 15 >>>>>> Title: The 'XML2RFC' version 3 Vocabulary >>>> Nits: >>>> Section 3.7.1: 'style' attribute (for <spanx>) >>>> >>>> Currently: >>>> >>>> Deprecated. Instead of <spanx style="emph">, use <b> instead of >>>> <spanx style="strong">, use <i>; instead of <spanx style="verg">, >>>> use >>>> <tt>. >>>> >>>> Should say: >>>> >>>> Deprecated. Instead of <spanx style="emph">, use <b> instead of >>>> <spanx style="strong">, use <i>; instead of <spanx style="verb"> >>>> or <spanx style="vbare">, use <tt>. >>> Fixed verg -> verb. I don't see vbare in the v2 syntax. >> >> vbare is/was in the xml2rfc v1 vocabulary. It mysteriously disappeared >> from being mentioned in v2. > > Incorrect. Apparently you confuse "v1 vocabulary" with "whatever the TCL > code accepted". > >> See, e.g.: >> https://code.google.com/p/uri-templates/source/browse/trunk/spec/xml2rfc.tcl >> >> : >> >> >> proc spanx_html {text style} { >> set p 1 >> switch -- $style { >> verb >> - vbare { set e tt } >> vemph { set e {tt em} } >> vstrong { set e {tt strong} } >> vdeluxe { set e {tt strong em} } >> emph { set e em; set p 0 } >> strong { set e strong; set p 0 } >> default { set e {}; set p 0 } >> } >> ... > > What I call "v1" is what was defined in RFC 2629. What I document as > "v2" is what was properly documented (in the DTD or the WIP RFC2629bis > document) *or* interoperable between current implementations as of 2014. > That's simply not the case for the "v-" styles. > ... And I just checked; among the ~1600 XMLs for which I have the AUTH48 source, vbare was used exactly once -- in RFC6716 where it's abused to put a large hexdump into the spec. Best regards, Julian
- [rfc-i] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-h… Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-h… Sean Leonard
- [rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-hoffma… Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-hoffma… Sean Leonard
- [rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-hoffma… Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-hoffma… Julian Reschke