Re: [rfc-i] acknowledging reviewers name in RFCs

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Sat, 18 April 2020 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB4B3A0B45; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wmQEl-a66xc8; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C189E3A0B3F; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0515F406D3; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE8CF406D3 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xuFyFzYA_NC9 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BC50F406D1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id k13so5309054wrw.7 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=zx/7xZwGltHwowZpaNtpcTQmk6cV/XjCmCBtqlny5nM=; b=me1zWY+8dP5O/88ginZ68Ldlp7ddS1vpiOEqTwiD6Zz9OE7Gs4oJagSjmWoq4rCwik 03y1X1FMqJXxK0/AT3nLO80OO2e9weCm8FXOouU0MkSy1KT3LZOHeW4O3O68g+tLEHWS lVkuneRAsEfHLQ+uHOdhpbzPCY3lugcJSL66XnC26lm9U0ZevtKEAf5nS0ofv60Wz827 fC02NPaFmeduOmnZ9KdevJO2Id/AZLialjfxa+lqiBBwKsNqKKkhI12LnXy2ZVD/vkJw MZ6sLOgrawxgO9ksiW+dD/QT7rHyPONHGptcmns6J3OfVHagvAkpd7mjVNjAqLtjbZaw esEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=zx/7xZwGltHwowZpaNtpcTQmk6cV/XjCmCBtqlny5nM=; b=g04AZhpuJAQMO+SUG8z8E8MR1i87ImLSDv7DnMP6aHk8SwNpktQBJG0IdngQ6+sPz5 GNsmIyvJ03tfe6tpYTclIxGuWUl3YL/nLzqgKd0AowSNBDIz3ZgXT804aE1lWrvC/nVN mJ7pJi0EN7Fx5vqpg4wNyCsM12njAMKAsV4RbkHJN5Gs+5v3KeB7sMHSvjpefKF/dtCF XZ3UYi8Q1jj3mts2vRzVtLJGLSJp5PXfk+IBdyn7BUyi1seGT8XnwUNPQ2Etzlcj3IGw YUknULzCXuoSXtqMCZS4fItdbBnUqDpZ99V36bo8XL1P8QxGz9f+GhbyTOZhV+ygiDHy 8GYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuauxUQui6pihtSTRIDPimc3Kx5v0f3vyJG4YAdyRETQdvcEIEas tVae8OU5gwZ6nRiV3yqUwK4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIUFHyuPfy1XqqeOfiCt0yr19FpVI+Bkt//4qS6NYelqB8Um+W+1TR825EWc6XDRcP/CPkfVw==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:cc8c:: with SMTP id p12mr9331716wrj.165.1587224577230; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5a00:ef0b:1016:1367:e7c6:2260? ([2601:647:5a00:ef0b:1016:1367:e7c6:2260]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u127sm4306206wme.8.2020.04.18.08.42.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <F7FB6F20-D02F-4ADF-932C-9AD95BBDEEAF@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:42:53 -0700
In-Reply-To: <210424B3-F24E-4601-B8EF-F822D9123005@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <20190507181846.GO19509@kduck.mit.edu> <f46c85a9-1179-35df-e737-77b9220af74b@levkowetz.com> <20190508003012.GS19509@kduck.mit.edu> <5602.1557340483@localhost> <12393.1587078258@localhost> <210424B3-F24E-4601-B8EF-F822D9123005@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] acknowledging reviewers name in RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6802839256003674232=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>


> On Apr 16, 2020, at 6:19 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2020-04-17, at 01:04, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>> 
>> In order to get there, it seems that we need to add semantic XML, and I don't
>> know what the process would be do that.
> 
> Color me skeptical.
> 
> Today, I can write acknowledgements sections such as
> 
> Adam Ant provided the initial idea that led to this specification and kept us on track using extensive reviews during its entire development.  Bernd dasBrot helped improve the editorial quality of the definitions immensely.  Charlie Cat provided a framework to review and validate the examples.  Dino Dog found a missing semicolon on page 46.
> 
> How do I translate this to XML?
> 
> If the intention is to make this accessible to bibliometrics ("Eamon Egg co-authored 46 RFCs cited in 374 other RFCs and reviewed 147 RFCs”), then we have two problems:
> 
> (1) RFCs which were published before this was done, don’t count,
> (2) we’d have trouble finding anyone who cared about these bibliometrics enough to make use of them in any meaningful way.
> 
> Not sure this is worth the effort.

Likewise.

Bob


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest