[rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-03, "9.2 <address>"

[tony at att.com (HANSEN, TONY L)]

On 7/6/16, 4:02 AM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:

>On 2016-07-06 00:13, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
>> On 7/5/16 2:38 PM, HANSEN, TONY L wrote:
>>> And we can continue to use the github location of the PDF doc for its issues.
>>>
>>> However, I was wondering if there was should be a more centralized location. E.g., where do issues with the CSS and plaintext docs get listed?
>>
>> Each format-related draft has its own github repository:
>>
>> https://github.com/hlflanagan/draft-iab-rfc-framework
>>
>> https://github.com/paulehoffman/draft-iab-xml2rfc
>>
>> https://github.com/hildjj/draft-iab-html-rfc
>> https://github.com/masinter/pdfrfc
>> https://github.com/hlflanagan/draft-iab-rfc-plaintext
>>
>> https://github.com/hlflanagan/draft-iab-rfc-nonascii
>> https://github.com/nevil-brownlee/draft-svg-rfc
>> https://github.com/hlflanagan/draft-iab-rfc-css
>>
>> https://github.com/paulehoffman/rfcv3-preptool
>>
>> I'll make sure those get added to the FAQ
>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rse/format-faq/>. For when we have code to
>> create issues against, I expect that will be in github as well unless we
>> have a good reason not to.
>> ...
>
> FWIW, the best place to state where issue tracking occurs is in the spec 
> itself.
> 
> Best regards, Julian

I agree with that statement when discussing I-Ds, but for RFCs there should instead be a pointer to a mailing list.

Should the RFP make sure that each of these drafts has a pointer to rfc-interest before publication as RFCs?

	Tony