[rfc-i] Moving the CDATA discussion in draft-iab-xml2rfc
tony at att.com (HANSEN, TONY L) Fri, 12 February 2016 19:16 UTC
From: tony at att.com (HANSEN, TONY L)
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:16:24 +0000
Subject: [rfc-i] Moving the CDATA discussion in draft-iab-xml2rfc
In-Reply-To: <D90849C7-2B15-4BCA-94DB-B68661E2DAB9@vpnc.org>
References: <D90849C7-2B15-4BCA-94DB-B68661E2DAB9@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <CF55114F-F42D-42E6-8F51-95006F5BDAB2@att.com>
On 2/12/16, 12:57 PM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Paul Hoffman" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote: >Greetings. While we are waiting for your comments and questions on all >the drafts*, some of us authors have a few questions of our own. I'll >start with a minor one here. > >The use of CDATA is currently discussed in detail in <sourcecode>, and >that discussion is pointed to in <artwork> where it is appropriate as >well. A few people want this moved to its own section and those two >elements point to it. That seems OK to me. Are there any objections? +1 from me Tony Hansen
- [rfc-i] Moving the CDATA discussion in draft-iab-… Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Moving the CDATA discussion in draft-iab-… Joe Hildebrand jhildebr
- [rfc-i] Moving the CDATA discussion in draft-iab-… HANSEN, TONY L