IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for feedback: the new CSS

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 06 December 2016 00:44 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A60129656 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:44:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com header.b=RnKAWhbt; dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=taugh.com header.b=epvM02E0
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NxX4UpOSDO6V for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:44:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7401312964B for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:44:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA71B800B5; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:44:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC1EB800B5 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:43:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=RnKAWhbt; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=epvM02E0
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01NxUH9kF6TG for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B76B8B800B2 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 57251 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2016 00:44:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=dfa2.584609d0.k1612; bh=lnl1WC7bZdeYh24uxDv5FxV5sRpwqh1TAXs00MVn8j8=; b=RnKAWhbtHL8/BF6P4QM7zAZf49Wc9DN5VvBsc/Hj67lWkr5zTAUKb5MB8/S2RkvtCUTTIQdacdXsghK8P+t0uFWKNx+XaS7AHJundoQZROb7eq7lwFzr0ife5QV0IRz75zIRDGCbx/NKhY1bgQl61jannhwbTVGgAGS7/XiILZRNGl48RcgJP+1LiIHOsAyABb1yhHEl/aGPufbF1io/aOxlwGUHeiRHgh/7fsrFDAsKT5Nzh1Ya7c8/Vi6bFKZA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=dfa2.584609d0.k1612; bh=lnl1WC7bZdeYh24uxDv5FxV5sRpwqh1TAXs00MVn8j8=; b=epvM02E0pYb9rKa56FIsnVVPI732efb+y6c9+KJEJf5QKXkiukDUzNrXVPMd0R604VHnxgTdwGvSX7sK2qXI6qW0mJjDKqn1VDTC+Gpu3lLt0HR4/MxxGgG+ZQKXmIx7DM6C6V+hhv/xroVXLCNYu00dUG1InATIzOSTSIpAZ45FdvrtDml/LTl7dk6j9CAU0tjt/X/syMw5VPHyUPTt5g0/X+ENWfneyWuSlkE8M/5tYUswEAsBenhJt1RGqicG
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 06 Dec 2016 00:44:00 -0000
Date: 5 Dec 2016 19:43:56 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612051941080.78142@ary.qy>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BECB977D-8B30-488B-9517-D562C85129A6@sobco.com>
References: <20161205193246.24386.qmail@ary.lan> <751B147C-3F6D-45FF-BCA0-557F2C2CBB4C@sobco.com> <BECB977D-8B30-488B-9517-D562C85129A6@sobco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1416991320-1480985036=:78142"
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for feedback: the new CSS
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

> Jorge pointed out that, at least for the foreseeable future, the courts will be seeing paper printouts
> of the documents, whatever their formats so the question of “text” is not likely to be an issue

That hasn't been my experience.  In recent years in depos and I think in 
Federal court we've looked at stuff on screens.  But I still think it'd be 
adequate to send them the XML and PDF and tell them we're pretty sure they 
say the same thing.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email