[rfc-i] Statistics on women authors?
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 07 March 2017 09:23 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B570129421 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:23:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1zTfjzrg-9zI for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:23:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44A1512940A for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:23:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9263CB80179; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:23:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0470DB80179 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:23:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HYzbpWXYCG5l for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:23:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB12B80178 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:23:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 04CA62801BF for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:23:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0022F280287; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:23:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (unknown [10.1.50.11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDADD2801BF for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:23:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.users.prive.nic.fr [10.10.86.133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF846042903 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:23:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E464C4071A; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:23:16 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 10:23:16 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Message-ID: <20170307092316.cqmd7wwjrkxhfvjn@nic.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.0
X-Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.087959, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2017.3.7.90915
Subject: [rfc-i] Statistics on women authors?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
Preparing the Women Rights day, a colleague asked my how many RFCs were written by female authors. I don't know, and, unless you know the authors, you cannot find it from the RFC alone. (Yes, you can guess from the first name but it is unreliable, specially for first names of other cultural groups.) Did anyone compile this information? Do we have stats? _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Statistics on women authors? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [rfc-i] Statistics on women authors? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [rfc-i] Statistics on women authors? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [rfc-i] Statistics on women authors? S Moonesamy
- Re: [rfc-i] Statistics on women authors? Todderick Weltzgrove