Re: [rfc-i] Implementations of v3?
"Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 24 October 2016 18:07 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC8312995D
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.033
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id hzFdFk1ek8hJ
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CF421293DA
for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>;
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33654B80176;
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B75B80176
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id bzA1JXxlQDJJ for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>;
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE7CFB80175
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8EA1E5658
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id LktjN-yjBcv7 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>;
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Heathers-MacBook-Pro.local (c-50-135-43-191.hsd1.wa.comcast.net
[50.135.43.191])
by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 636FD1E5657
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <20161024175942.GA30369@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
From: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <d7a8364b-52d0-e9c8-38f0-0514bb5d847d@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:07:14 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161024175942.GA30369@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Implementations of v3?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions."
<rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
On 10/24/16 10:59 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > Now that the RFCs on the new canonical format are in AUTH48, what is > the state of their implementation? I noticed the SOWs > <https://iaoc.ietf.org/rfps.html> but I did'nt find about the > results. Are the tools done, almost done, work in progress? The RFP went out for bid, with the end date of Oct 17 2016. The responses are still being discussed. So, no tools yet. Timing TBD. -Heather _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Implementations of v3? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [rfc-i] Implementations of v3? Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Implementations of v3? Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Implementations of v3? Russ Housley