IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64DF129C85 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:42:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.986
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vJ4h68itYzSB for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:42:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 956A5129E3A for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:34:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A093B80222; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:34:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6839B80222 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:34:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rst1_4pp47qh for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:34:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B2D6B80220 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:34:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id q130so68661046qke.1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:34:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Quv2N/tMvt+Nkgf5rFe09fWcApHQaiyBh3OopPB5ko4=; b=Ijay0/0yeNJbcFbcA2XPMEivwssGgUJg05Bj2gRHhQ+S4KCSKMdk3TQYQ4pEiVFpt+ L+utQ0wyu/3LJRqN4UmkvpKbZbC0Ox9reUXDYavEM/DiXUaPf20Ar9AArY2vnOahwHqK 83tYCik+l2GA+eMx/gbUxJUHU8hD6j/Mn9WDvt8Rkh8Rn5miJ0m6yiUtzjJL16ICPaTK YzwQODreN8HhbQcjykrUckncP6PR4hciEk0cL0rA9MWFjyClVcyM/RbAYwlKRKNTnQiD 7DJngmSZ8ptctHt2Rh8ByIjo/mHitAMUFBdJ1idoxsmL8VLmBDHP/wzgB486lyCfuFTU ZnQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Quv2N/tMvt+Nkgf5rFe09fWcApHQaiyBh3OopPB5ko4=; b=igaPpKArcOtUfO4ppRlbaSHIrBuh6dVupZODhqbk5HpnvCV+GqKUBratqgvq2clcz3 Hy/5WZtvybuJSO12Jj1CYTVDKh59ZMS0ndCSI5XVAeeGSGa5P6v3A2CoCV4s4P2qB4M1 8tn0SoDeja+vIN4RgNhG1NEMlDV3YVDXkLdKcuYp7V6nJgIm58+FjszAj7yd1ut8rzav Rnid1DGS/yai/v8j29bwuflZS2ghNnfGsk5JqV7BWCT+TWioqJpdSCRYF0r38RCVuzsu C1kP01tbxoXOgJ3c8KqEDmQtgIR3WFGnS/VyU1uMG6xCewYe0gRC7z8HoG63HtdS5fgY wZxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01mq4nEL6fa2+JFhZHsXhifrLSNZB3jl4/ILof/cWoOeRHERmrWoDOW15ee+n/YNQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.91.193 with SMTP id p184mr34408184qkb.301.1480620853300; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:34:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.20.218] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s41sm820516qtc.39.2016.12.01.11.34.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:34:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <85F29871-2C28-422B-9B44-0DFD10F7CAA2@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:34:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <C7939204-0B34-41EE-B3AD-F5C8D06506C2@fugue.com>
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
References: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org> <C7939204-0B34-41EE-B3AD-F5C8D06506C2@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6946996072915787972=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On Dec 1, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>  hopefully they do more harm than good. :)

Er, less harm than good…


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email