Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 21:20 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCD0129887
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:20:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Vt7D0Lpnmg7V
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:20:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 830DF1294E1
for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>;
Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:20:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D45B801DB;
Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:20:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A461B801DB
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:19:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id IfLTtDyR9pW3 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>;
Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:19:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13963B801D8
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:19:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9595300229
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:09:40 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
with ESMTP id JeJHoHpY0hrQ for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>;
Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:09:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net
[108.45.101.150])
by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 817B23001FC;
Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:09:39 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:17:08 -0500
Message-Id: <3C4F74F7-7D8F-4B75-8AEB-9306274F0660@vigilsec.com>
References: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org>
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions."
<rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8921474846817196736=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
Heather, > On Dec 1, 2016, at 2:21 PM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) <rse@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > Sample document: > https://rfc-format.github.io/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/sample.html I think that the index haven multiple columns is strange since nothing else does. Russ
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Dan York
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Russ Housley
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Adrian Farrel
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Yoav Nir
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Joe Hildebrand
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Russ Housley
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS John Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… Larry Masinter
- Re: [rfc-i] documents in court, was Request for f… John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS Julian Reschke