Re: [rfc-i] acknowledging reviewers name in RFCs

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 31 May 2019 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2334412025E for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2019 08:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SCO91c4JuIIW for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2019 08:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2990120255 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 08:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B8FB80D43; Fri, 31 May 2019 08:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C435B80D43 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 08:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35YzJCLL6-iU for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 08:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1369CB80D42 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 08:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5245138185; Fri, 31 May 2019 11:08:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 13442E0A; Fri, 31 May 2019 11:09:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D8ADAF; Fri, 31 May 2019 11:09:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU36GG6qLRz1igVWYQZkJpYQRYd6UVUCj13snzns5MsgHw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <30895.1559243194@localhost> <CAA=duU36GG6qLRz1igVWYQZkJpYQRYd6UVUCj13snzns5MsgHw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 11:09:56 -0400
Message-ID: <15315.1559315396@localhost>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] acknowledging reviewers name in RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4759488332800175059=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> wrote:
    > This sounds reasonable to me, it's useful information about an RFC's
    > development. And it would be less ad-hoc than the current Acknowledgements
    > section.

    > Much of this information is already in the Datatracker. Perhaps the
    > generation of this section can be at least partially automated by pulling
    > information from there?

That would definitely be trivial if we decided to not just accept XML to the
DT and inserted this directly.  A halfway point would be to have a way to get
the right XML out of the DT to be added by the author automatically
(#include), or via copy/paste/edit.

I hadn't really envisioned anything like the above; just that we make the
section less adhoc.  I agree that the much of the review info is already
available now.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest