Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 22 January 2020 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69935F40713 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:58:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ty494vGGhyi1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:58:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAFCFF40712 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:58:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 00MFq94H021101; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:58:41 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=aTHfO9xaOnGYDMrMBIJeMvSTLT/o+YenK0kspzOn8T8=; b=HV48/g2Z020Z3of1OqYYgGi+NNxB8d8xkFB1/ZIHT2wjjdhaj4xUaHQxy/R1IT1BIWeB NigLyYKX6HIf3ZyRks+oXFg+++mLgmpCr05Ftxv1tOzDuMowlIYhANgy3Cn7+AIs5KCK cBqyry9KsBCbhjkgUqiMKhFtgSX6ggVjUxWMu43RsSg2AqUFczx1UxQ2F1yifvMgBCXX jzL2gD8jxHFAy89tvViY5NrSnxmnAr3Yg5dFkjJccj/31jVH65LL72NBERDZWA18TkIE taMd4xYtVTIa1yyX4+g/bY947Yt8V0PNn0tjObDuKtSP5GVPka9wUkt3PhQLAWemP7kh gw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint8 (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [96.6.114.122] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xmjhqvcfq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:58:41 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 00MFrbJQ000387; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:58:39 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.57]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2xp6v2p03q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:58:39 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:58:25 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:58:25 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Thread-Topic: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Thread-Index: AQHVy+B9OwxZ65FseUON7RflOpok2qfsy4GAgAAYjYCAABABAIAHWKsAgACfU4CAABCVAIAAuPEAgACvawCAAHzPgA==
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:58:25 +0000
Message-ID: <4BEFDBE7-6D0E-46E2-BDC5-31D0121400C0@akamai.com>
References: <CAMm+LwiXhhJO7qYi41+DC4W7uMUVipXqyq75Fq2vagA1ppJNdA@mail.gmail.com> <10cca93f-a8b8-4c42-0653-3b12fa67ad12@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgA-1UffBfrH-Y3J6pfh7ni9kNrndp=gHNyUyi5j=oLxg@mail.gmail.com> <53607da4-6608-783b-b875-65551e3add19@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgNU2Dr3bB+A8k+UwbQiRRzgUkoRRh60tc6+bBv6CXwfQ@mail.gmail.com> <70ed6362-41ee-faf5-8f90-d094455dbdf4@gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwhy-AV_K5evzGdpDi-ynpLE4RxXCVB1HercickYfZaubg@mail.gmail.com> <27103.1579626232@localhost> <31cf835c-aad6-637f-fc12-8f3efa04e6e7@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <31cf835c-aad6-637f-fc12-8f3efa04e6e7@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.21.0.200113
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.114.35]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <300CBB397BFC464EA27461C46B007B5C@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2020-01-17_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=649 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-2001220141
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-17_05:2020-01-16, 2020-01-17 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=621 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-2001220141
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:58:34 -0000

>    I agree that the lack of coloured shading is annoying for many people, but *using* shading is annoying for people with limited colour vision.
  
Huge agreement here.  And further, the number of people who are qualified to set shading properly so that various color-limited people can still see things is small.  Probably close to zero percentage of those writing drafts.