Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section & tools
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 16 July 2020 22:45 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3730B3A0DC9; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LONGWORDS=2.035, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jYSK2oEN80rL; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C15373A0DC5; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C45EF40742; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C991EF40742 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R73u4dL6khsf for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A4D8F40741 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.105] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B78TQ04DzzyVJ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:44:58 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <69BD6664-8CC0-4400-83B6-4BD356F1E45F@tzi.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:44:57 +0200
Message-Id: <3CCFC1B7-06F7-4292-91FD-685535584E5B@tzi.org>
References: <69BD6664-8CC0-4400-83B6-4BD356F1E45F@tzi.org>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17F80)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section & tools
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4932708017367018744=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
Or - - v 3 in XXL rfc if you call that directly Sent from mobile, sorry for terse and autocorrect > On 17. Jul 2020, at 00:37, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: > > You need the -3 flag in kdrfc > > Sent from mobile, sorry for terse > >>> On 16. Jul 2020, at 23:01, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote: >>> >> >> Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: >>>>> On 2020-07-15, at 20:50, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Not sure whether xml2rfc v3 has special tags for contributors. If so, that >>>>> would solve the problem. >>>> >>>> Scanning through rfc7991 there seems to be no enhancements in this respect. >> >>> It does. They are not very well documented. >> >>> Kramdown-rfc supports them by adding a YAML entry like the authors entry: >> >>> contributor: >>> - name: Peter Occil >>> email: poccil14 at gmail dot com >>> - name: Many More >>> org: To do >> >> Thank you, I very much like this. >> I also noticed today that there was an IESG todo item: >> Warren Kumari to work on acknowledging shepherds, directorate >> reviewers in a more standardized/formal way. >> - Added 2019-10-10 (18 telechats ago) >> >> so, I tried this. >> >> I had a section called "Contributors" already, in the old textual form. >> And it actually details some major contributions, so I didn't want to remove >> it, so I have slightly renamed it. ("Notable Contributions") >> >> With just name:/email:, I get many complaints from xml2rfc: >> <string>: Line 1655: No declaration for element contact >> <string>: Line 1655: No declaration for attribute initials of element contact >> <string>: Line 1655: No declaration for attribute surname of element contact >> <string>: Line 1655: No declaration for attribute fullname of element contact >> >> I obviously know how to solve this by putting more stuff in. >> But, the bigger problem seems to be: >> >> <string>: Line 1614: Element section content does not follow the DTD, >> expecting ((t | figure | texttable | iref)* , section*), got (name contact >> contact contact contact contact contact contact contact contact contact >> contact contact contact) >> >> kramdown-rfc2629-1.3.8 >> xml2rfc 2.23.1 >> ... upgrading to 2.46.0. >> same result. >> >> -- >> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works >> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > _______________________________________________ > rfc-interest mailing list > rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- Re: [rfc-i] contributors section & tools & YANG Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Henrik Levkowetz
- [rfc-i] contributors section & tools Toerless Eckert
- Re: [rfc-i] contributors section & tools Adrian Farrel
- Re: [rfc-i] contributors section & tools 'Toerless Eckert'
- Re: [rfc-i] contributors section & tools Adrian Farrel
- Re: [rfc-i] contributors section & tools 'Toerless Eckert'
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [rfc-i] contributors section & tools Jari Arkko
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Alice Russo
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Toerless Eckert
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Michael Richardson
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] contributors section & tools & YANG tom petch
- Re: [rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] contributors section … Michael Richardson
- Re: [rfc-i] contributors section & tools & YANG tom petch