[rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-03, "9.2 <address>"

[rse at rfc-editor.org (Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor))]

Of course, that would make the most sense. Each of the drafts has a
github repository, so we can track there as needed.

Thanks, Joe, for helping me see the obvious!

-Heather

On 7/5/16 2:33 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
> I'm ok with using https://github.com/hildjj/draft-iab-html-rfc/issues, if that works for you, Heather.
>
>
>> On Jul 5, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) <rse at rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/5/16 1:14 PM, HANSEN, TONY L wrote:
>>> On 7/5/16, 4:00 PM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of jhildebr at cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 1, 2016, at 4:32 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>>> ?
>>>> I'm fine with that.  Hold for document update; this shouldn't delay getting started on tooling, and has a minimal impact if we change it.
>>> Do we have a place, other than the author?s notes, where such items will be collected?
>>>
>>> 	Tony
>>>
>> I've been discussing setting up a tracker for this; right now, the items
>> are in email messages. Julian has been using the xml2rfc issue tracker,
>> which makes sense for some things given we don't have a better place
>> yet, but I don't think that's the right longer-term location for issues
>> and suggestions for the new format material.
>>
>> -Heather
>>