IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] contributors section & tools

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 15 July 2020 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076DB3A08B8; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZvmKZoYaX8is; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 899403A0948; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C030F4075C; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0BDF4075C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x65-MdI20NKn for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98554F40757 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 06FI4c7r017553; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 19:04:38 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0891322183; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 19:04:37 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E735722186; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 19:04:36 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.113.100.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 06FI4Z7x012809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 19:04:36 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Toerless Eckert' <tte@cs.fau.de>
References: <20200715174047.GF38490@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200715174047.GF38490@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 19:04:35 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <0b4801d65ad2$66a268c0$33e73a40$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHiRzsBszWW1GjpXtoJ+9jPO0BeAKjxFaKA
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.113.100.254
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25544.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--5.736-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--5.736-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25544.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--5.735800-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 1GZI+iG+MtfxIbpQ8BhdbA/5L1pUR3v2xkm+0YpML1fZph+FbFGABWiW BUhB/dX7iK4AoRG6tnCCAMLz7uhfhpGlJ5QKyUiC4h8r8l3l4eZUXmZR3qwgxi62hjZS0WoYAt+ 0ZcdQf5QhWM5Ah1+TEbujLhltI9TJFSVk0aMhzSsoAEFlnc8+Ra5zNeGRxnMhD+VDcFI0nBQhDB 23wWI6FOyJ6eIVEjWJMVgWP2b5R3j2+I2+EfS2Y8EvKlG0CjjIWuFm7TqL4eGRiV0eo0RbuGiw6 dACPIqT+W2Elaj143NYr/7xbQfT+/C2nAGd5g6BtT4jIeGRd/UFcnqPYTPUh6Y7XH28Hn1Ro8WM kQWv6iV95l0nVeyiuPvaZcqB7SGXC24oEZ6SpSkj80Za3RRg8GpIbhc7CF6yMfzbn7XzYSwmY+7 lWwW7hjIVIYF4H40iZN3NGvqQMNI=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] contributors section & tools
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

I believe Jari's script attempts to do this and counts Contributors in the
author stats it generates

The script is very vulnerable to formatting errors and since the
Contributors section is usually hand-crafted, the script often misses people
or documents.

Jari always welcomes fixes to the scripts. Last I looked there were lots of
"IF RFC=abcd THEN make this special exception"

A
-----Original Message-----
From: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org> On Behalf Of
Toerless Eckert
Sent: 15 July 2020 18:41
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org; rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [rfc-i] contributors section & tools

Is there any tool from e.g.: the IETF or Arkko publishing houses that
actually deparses names
in a contributors section and does something with that information ?
(aka: allows recognition stats like they are done for authors) ?

I could not find anything in RFC 7749 that would allow me semantic tagging
of contributors,
Am i wrong ?

If not, then parsing would have to be difficult and heuristic, and i
therefore fear the answer to my
above question is NO ?

Wasthere not a time when we wanted to make contirbutors better recognizeable
?

Thanks
    Toerless
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email