IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 15 December 2016 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473EB1296EC for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:58:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IV5Xormg3sHC for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:58:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B56F112995D for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:58:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F382B8017D; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:58:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C248B8017D; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:58:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RWjB6VkLN9ja; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:58:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 057F9B80178; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:58:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.112.107]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mh9yT-1bvp5Y3BDN-00MORM; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 19:58:37 +0100
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <0efdc6b9-5bc5-c14c-7d25-5f0e8e96ba72@rfc-editor.org> <f540477c-08f1-944c-be13-38a31086cf4b@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <354e7be3-679a-96ce-4d86-4742054fa3a6@rfc-editor.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <ce097cbe-9480-df2e-5aab-0b8781248983@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 19:58:36 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <354e7be3-679a-96ce-4d86-4742054fa3a6@rfc-editor.org>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zcNU77Z0fkk96FTBpNBDYYMMYF8VTB7YPnuWbHp1KLlnQRMxUsD eSnPlALwzke+l6xPdHEAUfrPSh/wBtZlFzYn/+Wl31ym0uYFWFxaxJX/hYsa3An/pz88Cj7 oo2otfw1vTw/nW6nKcgAKC2B18dOYXwe5XB5hpaPDzm9+8jt4rPbcJCbdYei+Q1Uk5yUxLk unE+NqesgwZTBegYIRTsA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:INXXPSU0Nzg=:H4y2kWaxq4zAXdb+Kwa8hU 0j1lljy8cLzgRvOU7N7K7iL6kI26vZQz/P/Qo7CR/QX2vzyv1ZJ6K+kGiApdfv9f6qCzlVTSu icnDY5HgY6+zOKYGYS2hVeLf5z9eD+712loU+88N6y8OL2ct3wI+WjOPaqOBhrKboY47tycVo 8h8wE7hKhefQyfQC8oHx+hOPqP3Q3WVOxerX0Oq3rgLLQ3h8/Rpz9XNJOjb+thXBWnR13wt/1 i4BDplmgDwDeLr4KJLGxE80F+8RVn/S714sZX9WGKAxakzWT+2pFBt+hWZdK+MzrU0CSAxstw Q9fD408nl+YtC1YwtdDJKy1XvZAjMKqJ2d+vMWGviURup9h00+l6l4dT9ytQVo5ePa61rVBDe 4nJt1pG8N9CItuWQA7moXbpkC+p6gosYYeFBp/6Pxf0LRse4T1O7xMNlDe+Bu5ktju/kZ9uBe vN1dFYSOCY3yLn2V49EdMHPWz2JxyDg0WpFTqERUa1dPqT276PR7BLFuyanLF1PRfzYAfaNvT Mv/dV4tFd3ZZHR9vBR6WOEI8LfrzqIecOygZ7ImxmH0f6bDImtraqxIqwa3p6zefc7O88O8VD 0JPo052zicJxPwojWJyKd5VmY4a8VmvzmfBxAn1D5EoLyP0x2P/vez1NEmYdZ8vHCyX1a1sVg 6Ges17ovOCh1PrD6gZzSSLjsOAcLiVuQhYbgtvavhSAWnsmNYAyoTVbZNTp//fkMZ/RbNVfmj kqxwNFyFHW9k3bdABlaTlLktY1o9sNEIDSRB6aqoKBytXyx76VjtUtMefOQpMgcMKjuyJqfuS g6wcUJE
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 2016-12-15 18:38, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> ...
> Where I ended up with this was to say that extended Latin without the
> parenthetical ASCII equivalent is ok in company names. It is not (yet)
> OK for person names. This is me being conservative and wanting to be
> absolutely clear re: person names, which allowing a bit of
> experimentation with company names. I recognize that other publishers
> don't treat this kind of thing the same way. We will adapt over time as
> technology evolves and this guidance re: using nonASCII characters in
> RFCs will almost certainly evolve too.
>
> The characters must work for more than just browsers, and I'm having
> rather mixed results with text readers for even extended latin characters.
> ...

"text readers" == "programs displaying plain text files"?
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email