Re: [rfc-i] Update on the CSS - second round

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Tue, 21 February 2017 22:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DE9129D73 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:38:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.428, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Fwu0qQVhurD for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:38:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153A6129D66 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:38:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86E2B810F3; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:38:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2007AB810F3; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:38:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vMGJ2irIWwGb; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:38:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC02DB80269; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:38:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 62so61234513oih.2; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:38:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jVQ5ffKUpjgHlBavQ45BSYL4bRG6pgwPem3LmF14P8k=; b=UGlVsna2TBhFnfjPEx4prQmymCOJ+bqHOro3XDbv6BS2/HbRF0jzOIllcwYvNM9VAF W1BsrVfKw71/h5o9Q8JPb9UaOLRMdqWrDS/Z21mjNfWxhP0EpWcUPbu8zilCwCXmzjTc CUugSplkVDdQQg4l1fcpZuenTwMeRma0q+8It/XZFdBeqMMM5FnBrP30bJxSZJcSrItA Nxz8QPqICUZKDjaCwLlPu0uh41E8JuymWqr/nybck7W4PfyqIXTUFgL4LRLWzfWzQ2hD RQh1kEGuIrbcoEl21sS95U9NVS64EQDFfC7ALynUZNUNLBksEGcViPKSCB2vzun39Lxi zAcA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jVQ5ffKUpjgHlBavQ45BSYL4bRG6pgwPem3LmF14P8k=; b=in02rTUIb4dU1lq9NupLvKNIrcS57J5yk3DXxGi4taDolXJRM0BZl0b4NH20IDXSzt BOvoseCvkvmxY5QG1feowFRJoXb50roHb3ntdiZWEPsvNJF6S1RCp31ATpfPhizEX4Ok +NwOaHTDVVjkjmgMLIXlWLa7H21wRQiT3wUVdtUxtY8mclt7YVrEPGWP5mTjjLT540nI mcESvtB/lU/a3qamAtxX8koF7JN8S65/0W9P77rRrc3zRlBBwvf39nqIqn1yMtOuu/5L +y9cS/h7v8R8iyIYm2QZIdgImOovX1tstv6yQsam59pFtmDBwLUvjYIvzCiK2njS9Q7d VNDw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mmfIm1OOOnlEZ2tNK/jdsjjnhUF2xwfVnN3+iMCYA6jF/EaZOc9GxDIbNUpqpHd2K008dByTpaTAQ/eg==
X-Received: by 10.202.8.201 with SMTP id 192mr1401265oii.6.1487716725159; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:38:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.52.7 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:38:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ecad592d-2123-bf84-6c6e-22531136afd7@rfc-editor.org>
References: <ecad592d-2123-bf84-6c6e-22531136afd7@rfc-editor.org>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:38:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA=duU1P1zs0rMUkHgW98r5HQrUQAx_R-fxL0mm+Eg0B9VnBUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Update on the CSS - second round
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5400170786261891512=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Heather,

This is very nicely readable on my iPhone. My only comment is that the
indent on the references leaves a lot of white space when holding the
screen in portrait orientation, perhaps just the first line should have the
full indent.

Thanks,
Andy


On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) <
rse@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Back in December, you all had an opportunity to review the first draft of
> the CSS that will be applied to the HTML RFCs that will be produced by the
> RFC Editor when the new formats go live. Issues were collected in github,
> either by individuals who posted directly, or by me as I harvested issues
> out of various email threads. You can see the issues here:
>
> https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues
>
> Based on the issues collected (with some decisions from me where we had
> contradictory input) the CSS developer has built a second version of the
> CSS. You can see the new look here:
>
> https://rfc-format.github.io/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/
>
> One of the basic changes includes the addition of a very simple JavaScript
> was added to allow for a hamburger menu to appear when the screen is
> resized such that the ToC disappears. This JavaScript is not critical to
> the reading of the text, and so would be allowed.
>
> For the issues in github, the following actions were (or were not) taken:
>
>    -
>
>    https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues/17
>    -
>
>       [DONE - set table p to margin 0]
>       -
>
>       Too much v-space in tables
>       -
>
>       NOTE: Seems like significant over-selection; would be better to
>       select on a class.
>       -
>
>    https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues/16
>    -
>
>       [DONE - fixed the lists]
>       -
>
>       Levels of indentations for lists from headings
>       -
>
>    https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues/15
>    -
>
>       [WON'T DO - See #10]
>       -
>
>       Increase body indent from headings
>       -
>
>    https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues/10
>    -
>
>       [DONE - indentation removed]
>       -
>
>       Don’t have body indent from headings
>       -
>
>       NOTE: is in contradiction to #15
>       -
>
>    https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues/8
>    -
>
>       [DONE]
>       -
>
>       Padding on aside too large (particularly vertically)
>       -
>
>       FIXED: remove most padding from aside.
>       -
>
>    https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues/7
>    -
>
>       [NO CHANGE - kept as is, allowing columns for the Index section
>       except on small devices]
>       -
>
>       Index in columns
>       -
>
>       NOTE: glad that this appears to be supported.  I would like to keep
>       columns.
>       -
>
>    https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues/6
>    - [DONE *- *fixed monospace font sizes]
>
>       -
>
>       Heading with a monospace item in it
>       -
>
>    https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues/4
>    - [DONE for small devices where the menu will hang over the page
>       content; wide widths have no divider (to remain uncluttered)]
>
>       -
>
>       Visual separation between draft and TOC
>       -
>
>    https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues/3
>    - [NO CHANGE - prefer the margin + border to ensure blockquote stands
>       out]
>
>       -
>
>       Frame + border seems too much for blockquote
>       -
>
>    https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues/2
>    - [NO CHANGE - paragraph spacing easier to see using real examples of
>       sample2.html and sample3.html - we should wait for feedback on this now
>       that the community can see what the paragraph spacing looks like in
>       practice]
>
>       -
>
>       Paragraph spacing too large
>       -
>
>    https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/issues/1
>    -
>
>       [DONE - headings decreased in size both in desktop and mobile
>       versions]
>       -
>
>       Headings too large
>
>
>
> Please take a moment to look at the slightly updated design, and to post
> your feedback either to this list or directly to github. I’m expecting the
> third (and final, for now) set of changes to focus on polishing the details
> of the look and feel.
>
> Thank you for your time and attention!
>
> --
> Heather Flanagan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>
>
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest