IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] HTML version of xml documents

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C5E1299EF for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:32:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5qD9IlQbOoRr for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:32:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 992C5129E91 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:17:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52375B8013C; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:17:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72ECB8013C; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:17:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7X7khDE4zLFz; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:17:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x244.google.com (mail-pg0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::244]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E69EB8013B; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:17:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x244.google.com with SMTP id p66so5564746pga.2; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:17:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:references:reply-to:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2PBBpmuWDBgr2UJPWUWLX5mO67bs8AkRwZDVfHfOeOA=; b=PlNdfbmRYOYktMcdgNkK2dA2tLrb95fBXDnmHZyG85Y7ev2sVFI+zt/hG9J+lhCao1 COJUZ4LAGdADmN9tHI5Df3rhcAj6LB73hPpr2/iIPXolauEvE/LGA9ch0glmtEYf1LSZ diaHpt4sfT3bxgtHMV0y042QqAtTN1XQcp7rhfXAj+CJzhfo6gZ/7VWDrdj8rFmgRZQz /VdzCbJoot/bdYbtrOj5aCQKCk++GVppJOPm28P9Mrv2A6cBaDJfISMttv7aqR4PbBSt zTvccr+bDcBm9TvfnXzPGQI1Z6JzbFZkCqsjc79fiG68e8UZggA8cntiTkwrZbbS829H ANSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:reply-to:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2PBBpmuWDBgr2UJPWUWLX5mO67bs8AkRwZDVfHfOeOA=; b=R0aclY6Bzyd/EvMsR/S6YSeVvkLPmbvT+0yigT34gsJjm18imE75+sd9w3tb/masFz OJ7XLtqGDCYIDHqxbbMFplirlsJGY8+Hfzx616qMKLZCIMxL0SClpTW3tmecIOlxoBlp CPEvJEujmCiyBGdazp4Ub8jUNuEilh1t5R9q1MiUSUR2QfO/+8f3SlsJXXbfeUw8MWJC D5ltVUzbFokdPuI4e6eF9+SUldk941mhw7HE9ssHludmNm57ummzZb7t636s5yLYXrHH CRqPWU/i9Tbt1L8ll5RP1lzgcOn3d3HdT8K5CMvhM555GcBbLHPx7lk3KLZziGd+0UUe R9oA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00ER/d5yVSN5GFQwBHfFzV5BwiKV3fpsT5nuq30RUf6aVzdYPiKpp72fLlTJfyrGQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.131.67 with SMTP id h64mr40580524pfe.86.1480623424882; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:17:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2602:304:cda0:8800:8d0b:864c:37d6:42c9? ([2602:304:cda0:8800:8d0b:864c:37d6:42c9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 13sm2157541pfz.30.2016.12.01.12.17.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:17:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <522c7563-ae0e-67b7-315a-604de1d961fd@dcrocker.net> <51c2caef-5bb0-35aa-4480-a686857c5ad9@rfc-editor.org>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <99286924-559d-f655-a1a4-dfa8d31afa36@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:16:55 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <51c2caef-5bb0-35aa-4480-a686857c5ad9@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] HTML version of xml documents
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 12/1/2016 11:36 AM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> You're going to provisionally approve of the new CSS. I'm sure you'll
> have more immediate suggestions when you do. :-)
>
>>
>> 2. Tables
>>
>>    Use html tables, rather than emulating the text ascii style
>>
> Yes, we already took that into account.


Oh goodie.

Thanks!

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email