IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Implementations of v3?

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 24 October 2016 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC07A1299F4 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.032
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.032 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rgbVRMT7jZkV for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 637261299EC for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1502FB8015E; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D066B8015E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wSIhTtxSwsaz for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C6D6B8015D for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B283300AA4 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:24:27 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id g-8Vtk8N7lIw for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:24:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1561130050E; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:24:26 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20161024175942.GA30369@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:22:40 -0400
Message-Id: <AD98917F-8D1F-4907-AA40-7967497B1D2B@vigilsec.com>
References: <20161024175942.GA30369@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Implementations of v3?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Bids were due last week.  Awards have not been determined as yet.

Russ


On Oct 24, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:

> Now that the RFCs on the new canonical format are in AUTH48, what is
> the state of their implementation? I noticed the SOWs
> <https://iaoc.ietf.org/rfps.html> but I did'nt find about the
> results. Are the tools done, almost done, work in progress?
> 

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email