[rfc-i] Unicode in ABNF (in RFC) draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-01.txt
Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> Mon, 03 October 2016 06:27 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEB912B093
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id fkazhIu7gIaL
for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF87912B01E
for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>;
Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB86B80B67;
Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B915B80B67
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 9nWyehX3rDKy for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>;
Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183])
by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63F7B80B66
for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.123.7] (unknown [75.83.2.34])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24483509B6;
Mon, 3 Oct 2016 02:26:54 -0400 (EDT)
References: <147539145843.2906.13032756764513250005.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "abnf-discuss@ietf.org" <abnf-discuss@ietf.org>
From: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <147539145843.2906.13032756764513250005.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <1c5eb0fa-c6bd-ef6a-320a-8eaf28559d9e@seantek.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:28:37 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <147539145843.2906.13032756764513250005.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>,
"rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [rfc-i] Unicode in ABNF (in RFC) draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-01.txt
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions."
<rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>,
<mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
Dear ABNF-Discuss (and rfc-interest): This draft by Chris Newman and I addresses an interesting topic: how to do Unicode in ABNF. Unicode has showed up in several different ways in protocols that are described in ABNF. These ways are not consistent across the RFC series, but now that Unicode is a pretty stable standard (for its basic parts) and now that UTF-8 RFCs are becoming a reality per draft-iab-rfc-nonascii-02, it is a good time to look at this issue. This is a fork from draft-seantek-abnf-more-core-rules. This draft is currently proposed as Experimental. Special thanks to Paul Kyzivat for discussing the matters in this draft, although he is not formally a co-author. The draft tries to be very conservative in its approach. Please read the draft for details. Some stuff was intentionally omitted as out-of-scope or too complicated for a general-purpose ABNF syntax parser, whether humans or machines. Comments and feedback are appreciated. Regards, Sean ******** A new version of I-D, draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Sean Leonard and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf Revision: 01 Title: Unicode in ABNF Document date: 2016-10-01 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 11 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-01 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-01 Abstract: This experimental document adds support for Unicode strings in ABNF (Augmented Backus-Naur Form), and provides certain symbols related to Unicode code point ranges. _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Unicode in ABNF (in RFC) draft-seantek-un… Sean Leonard
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in ABNF (in RFC) draft-seante… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in ABNF (in RFC) draft-seante… Sean Leonard
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in ABNF (in RFC) draft-seante… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in ABNF (in RFC) draft-seante… Sean Leonard