[rfc-i] Unicode in ABNF (in RFC) draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-01.txt

Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> Mon, 03 October 2016 06:27 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEB912B093 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fkazhIu7gIaL for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF87912B01E for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB86B80B67; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B915B80B67 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9nWyehX3rDKy for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63F7B80B66 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.123.7] (unknown [75.83.2.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24483509B6; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 02:26:54 -0400 (EDT)
References: <147539145843.2906.13032756764513250005.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "abnf-discuss@ietf.org" <abnf-discuss@ietf.org>
From: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <147539145843.2906.13032756764513250005.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <1c5eb0fa-c6bd-ef6a-320a-8eaf28559d9e@seantek.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:28:37 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <147539145843.2906.13032756764513250005.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [rfc-i] Unicode in ABNF (in RFC) draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-01.txt
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Dear ABNF-Discuss (and rfc-interest):

This draft by Chris Newman and I addresses an interesting topic: how to 
do Unicode in ABNF. Unicode has showed up in several different ways in 
protocols that are described in ABNF. These ways are not consistent 
across the RFC series, but now that Unicode is a pretty stable standard 
(for its basic parts) and now that UTF-8 RFCs are becoming a reality per 
draft-iab-rfc-nonascii-02, it is a good time to look at this issue. This 
is a fork from draft-seantek-abnf-more-core-rules.

This draft is currently proposed as Experimental. Special thanks to Paul 
Kyzivat for discussing the matters in this draft, although he is not 
formally a co-author.

The draft tries to be very conservative in its approach. Please read the 
draft for details. Some stuff was intentionally omitted as out-of-scope 
or too complicated for a general-purpose ABNF syntax parser, whether 
humans or machines.

Comments and feedback are appreciated.

Regards,

Sean

********

A new version of I-D, draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Sean Leonard and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf
Revision:	01
Title:		Unicode in ABNF
Document date:	2016-10-01
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		11
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-01
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-seantek-unicode-in-abnf-01

Abstract:
    This experimental document adds support for Unicode strings in ABNF
    (Augmented Backus-Naur Form), and provides certain symbols related to
    Unicode code point ranges.

                                                                                   


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest