Re: [rfc-i] Update on the CSS - second round

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 22 February 2017 01:52 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79711294F9 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:52:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.089
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hPXdF4ottIWk for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:52:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3CEA1294E5 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:52:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8590B814E5; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:52:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7DEB814E5; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:52:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pk5EYHhS5mvU; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:52:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x233.google.com (mail-qt0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::233]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0BF1B814E3; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:52:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x233.google.com with SMTP id x35so53444743qtc.2; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:52:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hlWESf84eXMNGdlTSzKxbYxdNLxWLub4naQj39DvtYg=; b=ch6J0frtwEe3dZoKMQrotgYF7nhHyONrWCWekzc369/GUcmkpyfny7pJA/Ides5I// FFdujDB6k7QEWl/sFM61AYGcYByBCbUDiJ99k9gCcLW1gao37sFaObkW1tDIUu42asH/ YGYC5X2wrGy7Y8Hbzt8nCa/Bho1UwWPT5qsdHpJYbRoe0us/6cDJVY+6iIX0yQTqgwQK U5yCIjr+pSojmo72wdfBLdie8xv1aK5b6rIU0Nn5Uj+YMosVlq1M0xVmhxnHAVqxcb3p FVtUvegf7c19TBM8DXfbDY6t0UDoploO7u3XLPcrqMHKQ18G9ks6L/blVkw6Y/XqtKy4 UlPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hlWESf84eXMNGdlTSzKxbYxdNLxWLub4naQj39DvtYg=; b=Jrd/TCo67/VkBJ0UzWF89fhf5N2xdiw/tUmvucpJZc0MrmO/ynhWE64tRPC9t6FYkC bGhglPrESE2cau8PG9cekBeCK5NLigjCqa71xOyUGYtPyrjkzo7NO2zXIk9fEv1I9g7p 7Nn5FEUxlag/7WhvXvguFZBJ5LR237CUMEI0e68PThnZ6E1gLs08xy21cCDw+dFirQF9 mtAJpJS8H6Ob03EpNesH8on7ACZgtHQvEqE9LgqX/GHhiPAqsTmjNgfBv2lZCcDPw+3g cAMU1TV+NTyfrJDO8LJb2eYx0wy5LtNZb7ANKar4RgBpQ4/EDxh1q2lOpDZWlsrc9C7o iv7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nw89ub17kOerU0WgCGw6g5kp5PZmx4Z5rlQiaq3Mbk5GXU2ST5wXy3dU5+yw12tClScmu46GfNvtMhnA==
X-Received: by 10.237.35.84 with SMTP id i20mr30914462qtc.247.1487728325780; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:52:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.19.112 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:52:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <013D3DF8-3AB6-4E00-9456-6EF82D961DA3@fugue.com>
References: <ecad592d-2123-bf84-6c6e-22531136afd7@rfc-editor.org> <013D3DF8-3AB6-4E00-9456-6EF82D961DA3@fugue.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:52:05 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXWiz6CsbWPXEp=Q3R401uf4G_RYDz3DT38FiNNU=KO4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Update on the CSS - second round
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, "Heather Flanagan \(RFC Series Editor\)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 22 February 2017 at 02:21, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> One issue that I noticed when playing with sample 3 is that scrolling the table of contents starts scrolling the document when you get to the end.   This is a bit of a usability problem, but I don't know if there's a way to fix it in the CSS.

I am not enough of an expert here, but I think that's a fundamental
problem with CSS that probably doesn't get fixed easily.  The best I
could suggest is to add a moderately large pad to the bottom of the
TOC/
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest