[rfc-i] gen area wg on IETF process changes for new format?
masinter at adobe.com (Larry Masinter) Sat, 12 July 2014 15:52 UTC
From: "masinter at adobe.com"
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 15:52:57 +0000
Subject: [rfc-i] gen area wg on IETF process changes for new format?
Message-ID: <50d9a26f3f0c48458c825298862d954b@BL2PR02MB307.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
As IETF processes seem to be out of scope for the RFC editor discussion... Is it premature to suggest a (General Area) working group to consider IETF process changes that are either (a) necessary or (b) enabled by the RFC Editor change in canonical format? It seems like some IETF process changes might be necessary, and also, there are other options which might require a process change. Don't pick on these, they're just examples: Necessary changes might include "insure that last call review has reviewed the figures" or "extend AUTH48 so editors can review the more extensive RFC editor formatting". Optional changes might include "Authors are encouraged to mark up normative statements and use &MUST; &MAY; &SHOULD; for features". Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net
- [rfc-i] gen area wg on IETF process changes for n… Larry Masinter
- [rfc-i] gen area wg on IETF process changes for n… Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] gen area wg on IETF process changes for n… "Martin J. Dürst"